{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":3,"sheets":["INSTRUCTIONS & TIPS","FOA CONTENT QUESTIONS","Admin Pick List"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":0,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"INSTRUCTIONS & TIPS","index":0,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,1],[9,0,9,1]]}
["INSTRUCTIONS"]
[1,"All questions pertaining to this funding opportunity announcement should be emailed to IRACODES@hq.doe.gov. "]
[2,"All questions pertaining to EERE Exchange should be emailed to InfrastructureEXCHANGESupport@hq.doe.gov. Include FOA name and number in subject line."]
[3,"All questions and answers pertaining to this FOA will be posted on Infrastructure Exchange within this spreadsheet."]
[4,"DOE will attempt to respond to a question within 3 business days, unless a similar question and answer has already been posted in this spreadsheet. "]
[5,"All questions should be submitted not later than 3 business days prior to the application due date. Questions submitted after this date will not be answered."]
[6,"Questions are assigned a number in accordance with when they are reviewed by DOE.  "]
[7,"Questions are assigned a topic area by DOE when reviewed."]
[]
["TIPS"]
[1,"Applicants may sort questions and answers in the question tabs of this spreadhseet by selecting the drop-down box arrow on the column headers and selecting any of the listed attributes."]
[2,"Applicants may search for questions and/or keywords by holding CTRL+F on the keyboard and typing in a phrase or keyword."]

{"sheet":"FOA CONTENT QUESTIONS","index":1,"n_rows":246,"n_cols":6,"rows_kept":246,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1,0,1,4],[0,0,0,4]]}
["ADMINISTRATIVE QUESTION AND ANSWER LOG"]
["DE-FOA0003056 - (IRA) Assistance for the Adoption of the Latest and Zero Building Energy Codes"]
["Question #","Date Submitted","Topic","Question","Answer"]
[1,"2023-12-26","Eligibility","Does this cover upgrades to existing buildings to bring them into compliance with the new codes? What are the limits?","This competitive FOA provides funding to States and units of local government with the authority to adopt building codes for activities aligned with IRA section 50131 including the adoption and implementation of the latest model building energy codes, zero energy codes, and innovative code equivalents such as building performance standards\n\nPer FOA Section I(B) Topic Areas, applications must propose building energy codes or innovative approaches to building energy codes that are measurable, verifiable, and enforceable. Examples of enforcement mechanisms may include permitting, certificates of occupancy, financial penalties, and/or civil suits.\n\nAs provided in I(C) an application will be deemed nonresponsive and will not be reviewed or consodered if it falls outside the technical parameters specified in Sections I (A) and I(B) of the FOA."]
[2,"2023-12-26","Concept Paper","Can an applicant apply for more than one topic area in the same application, or can they submit two separate applications – each on a different topic? Does each planned topic area need a separate concept paper submission?","Per FOA Section III(F) Limitation on Number of Concept Papers and Full Applications Eligible for Review, an entity may submit more than one Concept Paper and Full Application to this FOA, provided that each application describes a unique, distinct project, proposing the adoption of and implementation and compliance with, or implementation and compliance with, a distinct qualifying building energy code or innovative approach to building energy codes for a discrete segment of the building stock, and an eligible Concept Paper was submitted for each Full Application. Entities may submit a maximum of one Concept Paper and Full Application per Subtopic Area."]
[3,"2023-12-26","Concept Paper","Can an eligible applicant submit more than one concept paper before February 9, 2024? ","Per FOA Section III(F) Limitation on Number of Concept Papers and Full Applications Eligible for Review, entities may submit a maximum of one Concept Paper and Full Application per Subtopic Area. Please also refer to the response to Question #2."]
[4,"2023-12-26","Eligibility","If a jurisdiction has passed a Building Performance Standards Law that applies to existing buildings, could this funding be used to renovate existing public buildings to comply with a BPS requirement?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[5,"2023-12-26","Eligibility","Can this grant funding be used to translate outreach materials that communicate zero-building-code requirements in multiple languages?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[6,"2023-12-26","Eligibility","If a jurisdiction has passed a Building Performance Standards Law that applies to existing buildings, could this funding be directly used or subgranted by the eligible applicant to low-and-moderate income housing and other under-resourced buildings for building upgrade projects in pursuit of compliance with a Building Performance Standard and/or major renovations that would require the building to come up to current building code?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[7,"2023-12-26","Eligibility","Can this funding be used to support a residential home labeling program, including home energy efficiency upgrades for low-and-moderate income homes (e.g., could this be considered a building performance standard)?  Phrased slightly differently:  Would DOE consider a residential home labeling program akin to a building performance standard?","Per FOA Section I(B) Topic Areas, applications must propose building energy codes or innovative approaches to building energy codes that are measurable, verifiable, and enforceable. If a home labeling program were designed to mimic a buidling performance standard that was measurable, verifiable, and enforceable then an eligible entity could submit it for consideration if the rest of the FOA criterion are met.  Per FOA Section I(B) Topic Areas, all innovative codes pursued through this Funding Opportunity Announcement must meet the equivalent energy savings requirement when compared to the relevant latest model code that is a qualifying building energy code. Applicants must demonstrate equivalent or greater energy savings for the specified code using the methods and documentation described in Section (IV)(D)(vi) Equivalency Calculator and Equivalency Analysis of the FOA.\n\nHowever, DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the applicant. See also FOA Section III Eligibility Information."]
[8,"2023-12-26","Eligibility","Can this grant be used to fund permit department training on advanced codes?  This would be for plan review and inspection teams for commercial and residential construction.","Per FOA Section I(A) Background and Context, DOE is particularly interested in supporting States and local governments in implementing local capacity building and multi-year investments in workforce and education. As described in the technical review criteria in Section V(A)(ii) Full Applications, applications should demonstrate how the proposed project and activities will result in long-term support for capacity building, workforce development and training efforts to establish place-based jobs and support community-level implementation.\n\nHowever, DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the applicant. See also FOA Section III Eligibility Information."]
[9,"2023-12-26","Eligibility","Can this grant be used to fund training and outreach for design firms who are responsible for complying with advanced codes?","Please refer to the response to Question #8. See also FOA Section III Eligibility Information."]
[10,"2023-12-26","Eligibility","Can this grant be used to hire 3rd party firms (consultants) to develop compliance aids to be used by design firms who are responsible for complying with advanced codes.  this would include but not be limited to:  common code failure guides, dash boards, data collection, data analytics, and data reporting?","Per FOA Section III(A)(ii) Domestic Entities, the prime recipient must be a State, or unit of local government that has the authority to adopt building codes, unless delegated as outlined in Section III(A)(i) Delegation of Authority of the FOA. Nonprofit and for-profit entities, which may include consultants, supporting proposed project activities are eligible subrecipients under Section III(A)(ii) Domestic Entities.\n\nHowever, DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the applicant. See also FOA Section III Eligibility Information."]
[11,"2023-12-26","Eligibility","Can this grant be used to hire 3rd party firms (consultants) to develop data collection forms and database upgrades including items such as: dash boards, data analytics, and data reporting?","Please refer to the response to Question #10."]
[12,"2023-12-26","Eligibility","Can this be used to coordinate the community publication of ASHRAE 90.1 with AHJ amendments for design team access?","Please refer to the response to Question #8."]
[13,"2023-12-26","Other","Will there be future opportunities for those that have passed zero building energy codes and the associated costs of implementation/adoption?","Per FOA Section I(B) Topic Areas, this Funding Opportunity Announcement may remain open for up to 18 months, with review cycles occurring approximately every 6 months, while funding lasts. The “rolling” nature of this announcement is meant to allow time for effective teams to be developed and strategies identified to successfully meet the goals outlined in the FOA. Appropriated funding may be expended after the first or second Cohort selections are made. If this is the case, DOE will notify the community via Infrastructure eXCHANGE that subsequent submission periods will be withdrawn."]
[14,"2023-12-26","Other","Will there be future rounds of funding for this opportunity?","Please refer to the response to Question #13."]
[15,"2023-12-29","Eligibility","In our state, one agency has the authority to adopt building codes and another agency (our agency) has the authority to adopt building performance standards. If our agency developed a concept paper and application related to building performance standards under Topic Area 3, would we still need the delegation of authority from the agency with the authority to adopt building codes?","Per FOA Section III(A) Eligible Applicants: In accordance with the Section 50131 of the IRA  eligible Ggrantees are defined as States and units of local government that have authority to adopt building codes.\n\nSection I(A)(ii) Program Overview and Strategic Goals: Section 50131 of the IRA provides funding for certain activities in support of specified building energy codes (i.e., qualifying building energy codes)... This FOA seeks to support the adoption and implementation of eligible codes by States, Territories, and units of local government that have the authority to adopt building codes."]
[16,"2024-01-01","Technical Topics","[Summarized] Please clarify the intent behind the Appendix C qualifying amendment “Set a major renovation trigger or percentage serviced square footage trigger for energy code compliance in existing buildings.”  ","Per FOA Appendix C, 3) DOE has determined a list of amendments to the qualifying building energy codes and zero energy codes that will not reduce the energy savings of the those building energy codes when adopted by States. Only these amendments to a qualifying code may be included in a State’s code adoption to be considered eligible for this formula funding.\n\n3)(a)(iv) (c) Amendments that set a major renovation trigger or percentage serviced square footage trigger for energy code compliance in existing buildings."]
[17,"2024-01-04","Eligibility","[Summarized] Can funding be used to upgrade old and inefficient HVAC for city public buildings to bring up to the newly adopted codes?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[18,"2024-01-04","Technical Topics","We are seeking guidance on which subtopic within Topic Area 3 would be better suited for BPS.","Per Section I(B) Topic Areas of the FOA, the adoption and implementation of certain innovative building codes, including certain building performance standards (BPS) for existing buildings are eligible for funding. Subtopic Area selection in Topic Area 3 should be determined based on whether the proposed BPS achieves equivalence with the latest model codes (Subtopic A) or zero energy codes (Subtopic B). The equivalence methodology is documented in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA and the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange.\n\nDOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the applicant. See also FOA Section III Eligibility Information."]
[19,"2024-01-04","Eligibility","If an agency different from the one responsible for adopting the building energy code is leading the adoption of BPS, can that particular agency submit a competitive application?","Please refer to the response to Question #15"]
[20,"2024-01-04","Eligibility","Is it possible for a state to submit a BPS application without initially including the building energy code as a component of the application? For example, BPS would be implemented first, which would lead to the establishment of an outcome-based code.","Per FOA Section I(B) Topic Areas, applications must propose building energy codes or innovative approaches to building energy codes that are measurable, verifiable, and enforceable. A building performance standads does not have to accompany an building energy code, but the building performance standards must meet the criteria in FOA Section I(B). Examples of enforcement mechanisms may include permitting, certificates of occupancy, financial penalties, and/or civil suits.\n\nPer Section I(B) of the FOA, the adoption and implementation of certain innovative building codes, including certain building performance standards (BPS) for existing buildings are eligible for funding. Subtopic Area selection in Topic Area 3 should be determined based on whether the proposed BPS achieves equivalence with the latest model codes (Subtopic A) or zero energy codes (Subtopic B). The equivalence methodology is documented in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA and the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange."]
[21,"2024-01-04","Eligibility","Please clarify what is meant by the “latest model code”. Is this IECC-2021 and ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2019 and will not advance to IECC-2024 and ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2022 or subsequent during the evaluation and period of performance?","Per Section 50131 of the IRA and Section I(B) of the FOA, the latest model code is the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for Residential and ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2019 for Commercial.\n\nSuccessor editions of IECC Residential or ASHRAE Standard 90.1 for which the Secretary has published in the Federal Register an affirmative determination that the updated code will improve energy efficiency compared to the previous edition of the corresponding standard or code will be qualifying latest model codes."]
[22,"2024-01-04","Technical Topics","Please clarify under Topic 2 the use of “weakening”. Is this to provide flexibility in the written code before demonstrating equivalency? To qualify for topic 2, do there need to be provisions in the code that weaken the base model code?","Per Section I(B) of the FOA, Topic Area 1 is for the adoption and implementation of a building energy code presented in Appendix C of the FOA, which include a qualifying building energy code that may have strengthening amendments only. Topic Area 2 allows adoption and implementation of a building energy code with combinations of strengthening and weakening amendments."]
[23,"2024-01-04","Eligibility","Please clarify Topic 2 “Custom” Zero Energy Codes or give an example.","\"Custom\" zero energy codes are those deviate from the zero energy IECC appendices identified in statute.  Per Section I(B) of the FOA, custom zero codes pursued through Topic Area 2 must meet the equivalent energy savings requirement when compared to the relevant latest model code or zero energy code that is a qualifying building energy code. The equivalence methodology is documented in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA and the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange."]
[24,"2024-01-04","Eligibility","Does use of a Zero Energy Code require documentation per building or is higher level acceptable for example at jurisdiction?","Per Section 50131 of the IRA, grantees must implement a plan for the jurisdiction to achieve full compliance with any building energy code adopted under the program. Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA outlines the specific merit review criteria that will be used to evaluate applications, including prospective compliance plan and ability to implement the plan. Applicants should clearly describe their compliance plan, noting the technical review criteria described in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA."]
[25,"2024-01-04","Eligibility","Please clarify what is / is not “innovative” for Topic 3.","Per Section I(B) of the FOA, applications must propose building energy codes or innovative approaches to building energy codes that are measurable, verifiable, and enforceable. Innovative code approaches may include certain building performance standards, or other code approaches to increase the efficeincy of and decarbonize new and/or existing buildings through certain measurable and enforceable requirements. All proposed innovative code approaches must achieve equivalence with the latest model codes (Subtopic A) or zero energy codes (Subtopic B). The equivalence methodology is documented in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA and the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange."]
[26,"2024-01-04","Eligibility","Is energy code “implementation” further defined or required proof of implementation defined?","Please refer to the response to Question #24."]
[27,"2024-01-04","Eligibility","Is there a definition of what expenditures can be funded? Are any expenditures excluded? For example, automation of the building process for information and steps related energy compliance from application to approved project can be critical, therefore, can software development and deployment be funded?","DOE does not have a specific definition of expenditures. Applicants should clearly describe their proposed approach to adoption and implementation in the application, noting the technical review criteria described in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA, including any software development or use for compliance, permitting, or enforcement."]
[28,"2024-01-05","Eligibility","If a jurisdiction plans to adopt Building Performance Standards in the future, would these grant funds be able to support a robust implementation and compliance plan which may include direct incentive payments to building owners for voluntary or early compliance at or above the adopted standard?","Please refer to the response to Question #27."]
[29,"2024-01-05","Eligibility","Can one application span multiple topics and subtopics?","Please refer to the response to Question #3."]
[30,"2024-01-05","Eligibility","If an application includes 2 subtopics, and 1 subtopic cannot meet the Go/No-Go criteria, does the entire project fail to proceed past Go/No-Go?","Please refer to the response to Question #3."]
[31,"2024-01-05","Eligibility","Can a state/jurisdiction use the funding to do an analysis to determine the feasibility of BPS or stretch code, without an implementation phase?","No. Per Section I(B) of the FOA and Section 50131 of the IRA, this funding is to adopt and implement qualifying building energy codes. "]
[32,"2024-01-08","Eligibility","We have a single state energy code. However, universities are their own governing body and many are an Authority Having Jurisdiction, adopting their own building and energy codes.  Would a university having AHJ status be eligible to apply for this grant?","Per Section III(A) of the FOA and Section 50131 of the IRA, eligible Grantees are defined as States and units of local government that have the authority to adopt building codes."]
[33,"2024-12-26","Eligibility","Can this grant funding be used to seed a revolving loan fund for no-and-low-cost building upgrades to comply with building performance standards and building code compliance?","No. This funding cannot be used to seed a revolving loan fund. See Section I(B) Topic Areas of the FOA. "]
[34,"2024-01-10","Eligibility","It seems this funding mostly surrounds building energy codes for new builds - “codes to adopt and implement the latest building energy code, zero energy building codes, or equivalent codes or standards.” However, I was wondering what “equivalent codes or standards” might cover? Could this include building performance and benchmarking legislation (such as LL97)? ","Per Section I(B) of the FOA, the adoption and implementation of certain innovative building codes, including certain building performance standards (BPS) for existing buildings are eligible for funding as long as they provide equivalent or greater energy savings. The equivalence methodology is documented in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA and the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange."]
[35,"2024-01-11","Concept Paper","When submitting a concept paper, will jurisdictions need to state both their topic area and subtopic area, or is it sufficient to indicate just the topic area?\n\nFor example, if a jurisdiction is interested in developing and implementing a building performance standard, they would apply under topic area 3. Will they need to indicate in the concept paper whether the BPS would be for subtopic area A or B? Or will the subtopic area be specified in a full application once the equivalency analysis is complete?","When submitting a Concept Paper in Exchange, an applicant must choose the appropriate Topic Area and Subtopic Area under which to submit. Exchange will not allow the Concept Paper to be submitted without making this selection.\n\nPlease see Section III.F Limitation on Number of Concept Papers and Full Applications Eligible for Review of the FOA document. \"An entity may submit more than one Concept Paper and Full Application to this FOA, provided that each application describes a unique, distinct project, proposing the adoption of and implementation and compliance with, or implementation and compliance with, a distinct qualifying building energy code or innovative approach to building energy codes for a discrete segment of the building stock, and an eligible Concept Paper was submitted for each Full Application. Entities may submit a maximum of one Concept Paper and Full Application per Subtopic Area.\"\n\nPlease also see Section I.B Topic Areas of the FOA document for more information about the objectives of each topic and subtopic area. It is up to the applicant to determine which subtopic area is the best fit. Applicants can submit more than one Concept Paper, but please make sure that each Concept Paper is tailored to one specific topic and subtopic area for each submission.\n\nPlease also refer to FOA Sections IV.C. Content and Form of the Concept Paper and V.A.i. Concept Papers."]
[36,"2024-01-11","Eligibility","Please clarify if “innovative” building code is limited to building performance standard?","Please refer to the response to Question #25."]
[37,"2024-01-12","Eligibility","If we have already adopted the 2021 IECC are we still eligible to apply for this funding? ","Applicants that have already adopted an eligible building energy code may apply for funding for compliance and enforcement activities. Applications will be evaluated based on the technical review criteria described in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA.\n\nPlease see Section I.B Topic Areas of the FOA document for more information about the objectives of each topic area."]
[38,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Is the funding based on work already done or based on the plan submitted? Meaning does a client have to spend the money up front in hopes of getting a grant or do they get approved based on their plan? How much of this money if left to be allocated","Please see Section IV.C. Content and Form of the Concept Paper of the FOA document for information regarding \"intends to adopt\" and \"has adopted\" distinctions.\n\nPlease also see Section V.A.i. Concept Papers of the FOA document for more information about how proposed projects will be evaluated.\n\nPlease also refer to Section II.A.i Estimate Funding and Section VI.A.iv. Applicants Selected for Award Negotiations of the FOA document for information regarding funding and negotiating a funding agreement.\n\nPlease also see Section IV(J)(ii) Pre-Award Costs and Section IV(J)(x) Invoice Review and Approval of the FOA document for more information on incurring costs and requests for reimbursement."]
[39,"2024-01-17","Other","What happens if a State does not apply for the formula funding? How is that money reallocated?","*Note that this answer refers to a seperate funding opportunity: ALRD, INFLATION REDUCTION ACT Assistance for Latest and Zero Building Energy Code Adoption (Sec. 50131), which is located here: https://www.energy.gov/scep/articles/alrd-assistance-latest-and-zero-building-energy-code-adoption-sec-50131-states-and.\n\nPer the ALRD, IRA Assistance for Latest and Zero Building Energy Code Adoption (Sec. 50131), for formula funding (https://www.energy.gov/scep/articles/alrd-assistance-latest-and-zero-building-energy-code-adoption-sec-50131-states-and), which is a separate funding opportunity from this FOA, applicants that are eligible to receive formula funding must submit a letter of intent indicating their plan to use the funding for eligible activities no later than January 31, 2024. States must submit the LOI to reserve their funding in order to be eligible for formula funding under this the ALRD announcement. States that do not submit a LOI by the deadline forfeit their eligibility for formula funds under the currently-open ALRD announcement.\n\nThe initial amount available to each State within each category of funding is included in Appendix B of the ALRD. Final allocation for each State may change based on the number of States submitting a letter of intent, or may be reallocated to other funding opportunities. Accordingly, the final amount of funding available to participating States may differ, but not decrease, from those amounts specified in Appendix B of the ALRD."]
[40,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Is engineering consulting an allowable expense? Are capital incentives for building owners allowable expenses?","Please refer to the response to Question #10."]
[41,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","What would be the difference in BPS in each bucket - model code vs zero energy code?","Per Section I(B) of the FOA, the difference between the Subtopics under Topic Area 3 is the equivalent energy savings requirement that the proposed Inovative Building Energy Codes approach is compared to. Topic Area 3, Subtopic A applications must meet the equivalent energy savings requirement when compared to the relevant latest model building energy code. Topic Area 3, Subtopic B applications must meet the equivalent energy savings requirement when compared to the relevant qualifying zero building energy code.\n\nThe equivalence methodology is documented in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA and the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange."]
[42,"2024-01-17","Other","Could you give guidance on the procurement requirements for partnerships?","The prime recipient under this FOA must be a State or unit of local government that has the authority to adopt building codes unless delegated as outlined in Section III(A)(i) of the FOA. Section III(A)(ii) of the FOA provides information on eligibility requirements for subrecipients under this FOA. "]
[43,"2024-01-17","Technical Topics","Outside of BPS, what constitutes an “innovative” or “stretch” code under TA3? How is this different than a code with strengthening and weakening amendments under TA2?","Please refer to the response to Question #25."]
[44,"2024-01-17","Technical Topics","Can you speak more on the definition of \"authority to adopt codes\" - for example local governments that have some authority implement stretch codes in states the set the base codes?","Please refer to the response to Question #15."]
[45,"2024-01-17","Concept Paper","Do we need the delegation of the authority before the concept paper is submitted?","Section III(A)(i) of the FOA provides information on the Delegation of Authority where relevant. This must be included as part of the the Full Application, per Section IV(D)(i) of the FOA."]
[46,"2024-01-17","Technical Topics","Can you provide more detail on differences between 2D and 3B?","Section I(B) of the FOA provides detail on the difference between Topic Areas and Subtopic Areas."]
[47,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","What’s DoE deeming LMC? Is it the 2021 IECC and which version for ASHRAE?","Please refer to the response to Question #21."]
[48,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","What about the eligibility of local governments who would have the authority to implement a BPS in a state where the base codes are adopted at the state level?","Please refer to the response to Question #15."]
[49,"2024-01-17","Concept Paper","Do you recommend including equivalency calculations in the Concept paper? Or should this be demonstrated in the full application?","The equivalence methodology is documented in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA and the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange. Submission of the Equivalence Calculator and/or Equivalence Analysis must be included as part of the the Full Application, per Section IV(D)(i) of the FOA."]
[50,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","I am with a school district. I have not been able to talk to my facilities department. Is this something a school district would apply for with the commercial custom code? MPS does not write or enforce codes. We apply/follow codes as accepted by the State of Wisconsin DSPS.","Please refer to the response to Question #32."]
[51,"2024-01-17","Other","Is there a teaming/partner list?","There is not a teaming/partner list for this FOA."]
[52,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Can funding be used for compliance and enforcement activities? What would be considered as eligible costs?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[53,"2024-01-17","Other","Given the very limited window for applications, will DOE extend the application period for IRA competitive grants?","Per Section I(B) of the FOA, the FOA may remain open for up to 18 months, with review cycles occurring approximately every 6 months, while funding lasts. The “rolling” nature of this announcement is meant to allow time for effective teams to be developed and strategies identified to successfully meet the goals outlined in the FOA."]
[54,"2024-01-17","Technical Topics","How are the methods to measure compliance evaluated? Is there are more credits given to a more rigorous method?","Technical review criteria described in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA."]
[55,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","What’s the max grant $ per project/client? Is it based on energy saved, construction cost, size of facility or other?","Anticipated award information is described in Section II(A)(i) of the FOA."]
[56,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Would capital dollars used to provide building owners with an incentive for early compliance, an eligible use of grant funds?","Please refer to the response to Question #27."]
[57,"2024-01-17","Concept Paper","Should we include references in the concept paper? What about the timeline and budget? How detailed should they be in the concept paper?","Guidance on Content and Form of the Concept Paper can be found in Section IV(C) of the FOA. An optional Concept Paper template is available on Infrastructure Exchange."]
[58,"2024-01-17","Technical Topics","Please clarify what are considered examples of non-BPS \"innovative\" codes for Topic 3/subtopic A.","Please refer to the response to Question #25."]
[59,"2024-01-17","Concept Paper","Does the Concept Paper need the calculators & compliance methodology descriptions to be included with that initial submission? Or is that for the April deadline?","Please refer to the response to Question #49."]
[60,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","I understand that only one application per subtopic can be submitted.  However, can you confirm that one application can span 2 subtopics?  For instance, one application that includes subtopic 2D and 3B?","Please refer to the response to Question #3."]
[61,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","We are interested in doing analysis to develop the next iteration of our local commercial energy code. Does this grant cover technical analysis or is only for codes that have already been adopted?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[62,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","If we're a jurisdiction that has a BPS, but it doesn't reach net zero emissions levels, could we apply for dollars to help implement the existing BPS (like for equity priority buildings) and then also apply for dollars to help us figure out how to get to net zero with the next iteration of the BPS? My impression is that the existing BPS would be under Topic 2 and a separate application for improving the BPS would have to be submitted under Topic 3? Is that correct?","Entities may submit a maximum of one Concept Paper and Full Application per Subtopic Area. Section I(B) of the FOA provides detail on the difference between Topic Areas and Subtopic Areas."]
[63,"2024-01-17","Application Content/Format","if a local government has implicit BPS authority as a home rule state, but not code authority, will a letter from the state on that be required or desired?","Please refer to the response to Question #15."]
[64,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Can \"implementation\" include bringing a building owned by a locality up to its new, approved BPS?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[65,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","The NOFO talks about BABA requirements and other building requirements. Are actual construction costs for implementing building improvements covered in grant funding?","Please refer to the response to Question #27."]
[66,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Must eligible Zero Energy codes achieve zero energy in the immediate future? Or can they work towards zero energy in the longer-term future? I.e. net zero by 2050","Anticipated Award Information, including the Anticipated Period of Performance for grants can be found in Section II(A)(i) of the FOA."]
[67,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Can a state apply for both Formula and Competitive funds for the same code adoption (e.g. residential zero code) if the scope of work in both the Formula and Competitive requests are clearly separate and distinct?","Section IV(D)(xvii) of the FOA includes guidance on Potentially Duplicative Funding, and Section VI(B)(xviii) of the FOA includes guidance on on Current and Pending Support."]
[68,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","If a jurisdiction has already adopted IECC 2021, can we still apply for funding related to BPS adoption?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[69,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","I have a certifications and green workforce readiness Training lab and cert. facility in Saint louis called W.O.R.C it launches April 1st. We provide training in construction, energy, and future green workforce trainings... could i qualify?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[70,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Would training programs for workforce to implement building energy upgrades be an eligible cost for the grant?","Please refer to the response to Question #27."]
[71,"2024-01-17","Other","Are field studies required for code compliance?","Per FOA Section I(B) Topic Areas, applications must propose building energy codes or innovative approaches to building energy codes that are measurable, verifiable, and enforceable. Applicants should clearly describe their compliance plan, noting the technical review criteria described in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA."]
[72,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Did you say already adopted codes are not eligible?","Please refer to the response to Question #37."]
[73,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Could you elaborate on how to apply and be considered for municipalities who have adopted ambitious codes but not enforced them yet?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[74,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","What type of activities could this funding support for developing BPS for a jurisdiction that has not yet done so (consultant fees?)","Please refer to the response to Question #10."]
[75,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Could I Qualify for funding using workforce training and compliance lab for certifications?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[76,"2024-01-17","Application Content/Format","If a small City wants to apply, should they submit a collaborative application with other entities (e.g., increase scale, but also complexity), or just submit solo (smaller scale, but also simpler)?","Per Section III(A)(i), the prime recipient must be a State, or unit of local government that has the authority to adopt building codes. As provided in Section I(B) of the FOA, it is a well-known challenge for smaller jurisdictions to find the bandwidth to develop an application for and subsequently administer a federal grant, so there are also simplified pathways provided for local governments to ease the burden of accessing these funds. In response to this challenge, Topic Area 1 provides a simplified pathway for local governments based on specified building energy codes. Technical review criteria for all Topic Areas are described in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA."]
[77,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Our state has adopted the latest codes. Could we use funding for 1 or 2 technical amendments of the state code? For example, requiring cool roofs for certain type of roofs?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[78,"2024-01-17","Technical Topics","Will the 2024 IECC be an eligible LMC once published? Or would that need to be Topic 3 project as a ZEC?","Per Appendix C of the FOA, a successor edition of IECC Residential for which the Secretary has published in the Federal Register an affirmative determination that the updated code will improve energy efficiency compared to the previous edition of the corresponding standard or code is considered a qualifying residential building energy code."]
[79,"2024-01-17","Technical Topics","Can you speak more to the definition of \"authority to adopt codes? For example, local governments that have some authority to adopt stretch codes in states where the base codes are set on the state level?","Please refer to the response to Question #15."]
[80,"2024-01-17","Technical Topics","Can you please answer it relative to \"innovative\" codes. Please also provide examples of non-BPS innovative codes.","Please refer to the response to Question #25."]
[81,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","Is technical assistance direct to construction projects an eligible expense? - e.g., funds for on-site training of construction crews on envelope details and installation procedure, or is this technical training only permitted for off-site training?","Please refer to the response to Question #27."]
[82,"2024-01-17","Application Content/Format","When does the applicant need to specify the specific vendors they will use for things like software for compliance, e.g. if they want to develop specialized Code Compliance software and submission processes?   Is it enough to specify the concepts in the Full Application or does the applicant need to specify the vendor and costs?","Please refer to the responses to Questions #10 and #27."]
[83,"2024-01-17","Concept Paper","Do we need the delegation of authority to be in place for the concept paper stage?","Please refer to the response to Question #45."]
[84,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","If a gov has three major tasks for BPS (1. develop BPS, 2. adopt bps, 3. implement BPS), and for some reason is not able to adopt, would expenses from the first task still be reimbursable?","Per FOA Section I(B), applications must propose building energy codes or innovative approaches to building energy codes that are measurable, verifiable, and enforceable. Applicants should clearly describe their full project approach and how each phase of the project supports the proposed outcomes, noting the technical review criteria described in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA."]
[85,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","If an agency different from the agency responsible for adopting the building energy code is adopting BPS, can that particular agency submit the competitive application and does it need a delegation authority?","Please refer to the response to Question #15."]
[86,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","If awarded, for jurisdictions that require a council's adoption of any new codes, would we need to verify a code has in fact been adopted within the grant's period of performance in order to receive the funds/be in compliance with the grant?","Please refer to the response to Question #1. "]
[87,"2024-01-17","Application Content/Format","For a city that wants to do a BPS and has home rule authority for a BPS (but not traditional energy code), is letter from state agency with formal energy code authority needed, or can a locality assert their home rule authority and that is sufficient?","Please refer to the response to Question #15. DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the applicant. See also FOA Section III Eligibility Information."]
[88,"2024-01-17","Other","Are there any procurement requirements for partnerships as set forth by DOE?","Please refer to the response to Question #42"]
[89,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","If you have code adoption authority can you apply for BPS funding, or do you have to demonstrate BPS adoption authority to apply for BPS funding?","Please refer to the response to Question #87."]
[90,"2024-01-17","Other","How is Justice40 incorporated into this opportunity?","Guidance on the Community Benefits Plan requirements for grantees can be found in Section I(D) and Section IV(D)(xiii) of the FOA."]
[91,"2024-01-17","Application Content/Format","Can multiple states, or multiple cities in more than one state, apply together, or do they need to apply separately?","Please refer to the response to Question #76."]
[92,"2024-01-17","Eligibility","If a state has already adopted an equivalent code, can the state apply for formula and competitive funding for the compliance, enforcement, and implementation of the equivalent code if funding is used for distinctly different and unique activities?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[93,"2024-01-17","Other","Sometimes it can be challenging for a City to accept and distribute federal grant funds, is it possible to team up with a partner organization to receive and distribute grant funds?","Please refer to the response to Question #76."]
[94,"2024-01-17","Application Content/Format","Could you describe more about what DOE is looking for in the community benefit plan?","Please refer to the response to Question #90."]
[95,"2024-01-17","Concept Paper","I have seen varying dates when concept papers (02/09/2024 vs 03/28/2024) and full applications (04/30/2024 vs 06/28/2024) are due. Could you please confirm the correct due dates?","Please see the FOA Cover Page for submission deadlines for the first round of concept papers and full applications."]
[96,"2024-01-18","Concept Paper","The FOA notes the potential for future rounds of funding starting in late 2024. If we anticipate applying for future rounds of funding, do we still need to submit a concept paper by February 9, 2024? Or will there be a separate deadline for concept papers for later funding cycles?","Per the FOA Cover Page, applicants must submit a Concept Paper by 5 p.m. ET on the deadline date listed to be eligible to submit a Full Application in the first funding round. DOE will update the schedule for the future rounds of funding when the timeframe is solidified.\n\nAt that time, the second round of Concept Papers will be required to be eligible to submit a Full Application in the second funding round."]
[97,"2024-01-23","Concept Paper","Do applicants need to indicate which subtopic they plan to apply for on the concept paper for the Assistance for the Adoption of the Latest and Zero Building Energy Codes grant? How can these be determined without doing the equivalency calculation?","Please refer to the response to Question #35."]
[98,"2024-01-23","Concept Paper","Do applicants need to include the equivalency inputs in the concept paper?","Please refer to the response to Question #49."]
[99,"2024-01-23","Eligibility","Can the Assistance for the Adoption of the Latest and Zero Building Energy Codes be used to pay for staff?","Please refer to the response to Question #27."]
[100,"2024-01-23","Eligibility","What DOE funding opportunities are open to a jurisdiction developing an embodied carbon model policy?  More specifically, would the IRA competitive funding for codes be applicable?","Please refer to the response to Question #1. Per Section I(A) of the FOA, energy codes can be adopted directly as a standalone code, or as components of certain more broadly adopted building codes. Applicants should clearly describe how their adoption plan will result in the adoption of eligible codes, noting the technical review criteria described in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA."]
[101,"2024-01-23","Technical Topics","Full compliance is mentioned multiple times particularly under the implementation plan and activities. Can you clarify the definition of full compliance? ","Please refer to the response to Question #24."]
[102,"2024-01-24","Eligibility","Would grant funding be eligible for conducting pilot projects in order to provide proof of concept for effective energy savings strategies?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[103,"2024-01-24","Technical Topics","Does compliance with zero energy code or zero energy building performance standard mean that the buildings must reach zero energy within the project period? (i.e. within 9 years for Topic 3 Subtopic B)","Please refer to the response to Question #24."]
[104,"2024-01-24","Eligibility","For applicants looking to partner with other eligible entities who would be subrecipients under the grant award, what is the applicable guidance applicants should adhere to in order to ensure compliance with federal regulations? Do subrecipients need to be competitively procured prior to application submittal?","Applicants should follow their procurement guidelines when forming partnerships and establishing relationships with potential subrecipients. Procurement does not need to be complete prior to application submission, but letters of commitment should be submitted with the application for relevant partners, subrecipients, and other participants as described in Section IV(D)(iv) of the FOA. "]
[105,"2024-01-24","Eligibility","Do planned partnerships identified in the Community Benefits Plan need to adhere to federal procurement standards or does a MOU suffice? Are partners identified in the CBP eligible to receive funding as subrecipients?","Partnerships should follow the appropriate procurement standards and guidelines of the applicant organization in addition to following federal requirements described in Section VI(B)(iv) and Section VI(B)(xvii).\n\nPer Section IV.D.xiii.1. Community and Labor Engagement: Applicants are strongly encouraged to establish partnerships with and provide funding to community-based organizations, labor unions, contractor organization, utilities, existing program implementers, community colleges and trade schools, and other organizations that represent or work with underserved households to reach and engage with these communities effectively over the life of the code development, creation, design and implementation."]
[106,"2024-01-24","Concept Paper","Is it acceptable for project scope to change between the submission of the concept paper and the submission of the full application? ","The project scope may change from what is presented in the concept paper."]
[107,"2024-01-24","Concept Paper","Can the budget mentioned in the concept paper be altered with submittal of the full application? ","Please refer to the response to Question #57."]
[108,"2024-01-24","Concept Paper","Does the concept paper need to include details regarding budget and project schedule?","Please refer to the response to Question #57."]
[109,"2024-01-24","Eligibility","Can grant funds be used to hire staff to support the project? ","Please refer to the response to Question #27."]
[110,"2024-01-24","Concept Paper","I am interested in applying for funding under both Topic Area 2D and 3B.  Can I submit one concept paper for both topic areas/projects, or do I need to submit a separate concept paper for each topic area? ","Please refer to the response to Question #3."]
[111,"2024-01-24","Technical Topics","In Section IV.D.vi it states that “Topic Area 3 proposals for innovative building energy codes for existing commercial and multifamily buildings must use the calculator provided and include the completed calculator with the application at the time of submission.” Is further equivalency analysis for a Building Performance Standard required be submitted to substantiate the savings inputs for the equivalency calculator, or is the equivalency calculator sufficient? ","Per Section IV(D)(i) of the FOA, for Topic Area 1, applicants must submit the Topic Area 1 Qualifying Code Amendments checklist or a narrative description of the qualifying code and amendments proposed per Appendix C. For Topic Areas 2 and 3, the applicant must submit according to the applicable direction in Section IV(D)(vi), the completed Equivalence Calculator, the completed evaluation pursuant to the Equivalence Methodology, or the requisite inputs for analysis."]
[112,"2024-01-24","Eligibility","Can the grant funding be used for these analysis portions, such as developing building sector-level energy saving targets for Building Performance Standards?","Please refer to the response to Question #27."]
[113,"2024-01-25","Eligibility","Can adopting/implementing/enforcing EV readiness codes be considered as part of an application?","Please refer to the response to Question #100."]
[114,"2024-01-25","Eligibility","Please define “full compliance” and provide an example.","Please refer to the response to Question #24."]
[115,"2024-01-25","Eligibility","Please define “compliance rates” and provide an example.","Please refer to the response to Question #24."]
[116,"2024-01-25","Eligibility","Are funds required to directly fund active workforce training? Or can a successful application use funds to enable workforce indirectly through other efforts in a jurisdiction and directly fund only code adoption, implementation and enforcement?","Please refer to the response to Question #8."]
[117,"2024-01-25",null,"Please provide guidance on whether concept papers should present a single project with a single dollar value or whether it is helpful for DOE consideration to present the single project in phases with a range of potential dollar values for award. ","Please refer to the response to Question #57."]
[118,"2024-01-25","Eligibility","If an applicant is pursuing grant funding for Topic Area 3, to implement innovative building performance standards, must it have authority to adopt building codes? Is it sufficient for it to have authority to adopt building performance standards?","Please refer to the response to Question #15."]
[119,"2024-01-25","Technical Topics","Under the technical review criteria \"Impact of Proposed Project\", there appears to be an incomplete sentence \"Potential impact of the project on advancing state of the art;\" (page 51 of the FOA). Can you please elaborate on what exactly that is \"state of the art\" that should be advanced by the project?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[120,"2024-01-25","Technical Topics","There is language throughout the FOA that appears to be relevant to construction projects. Page 53, under EIA, references the project's construction and operations. There is a section that references BABA requirements for infrastructure work (page 44). Can you please expand on what kinds of infrastructure work would be eligible for funding from this grant award?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[121,"2024-01-26","Eligibility","From the perspectives of National Labs. I was asked if Labs can submit letters of support with a city application?","Information on funding agreements with Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) is available in Section II(B)(i) and Section III(E)(i) of the FOA. In most cases, FFRDCs are funded independently of the remainder of the project team. The FFRDC then executes an agreement with any non-FFRDC project team members to arrange work structure, project execution, and any other matters. Section IV(D)(iv) of the FOA provides detail on the requirements for Letters of Commitment."]
[122,"2024-01-26","Eligibility","Can regional planning commissions write letters of support? Can regional planning commissions respond to this funding?","Section IV(D)(iv) of the FOA provides detail on the requirements for Letters of Commitment."]
[123,"2024-01-29","Eligibility","Can you provide guidance on all eligible uses of funds that are possible? For example, can funding under this opportunity be used to: Subsidize permit fees to help permit holders with compliance; Provide grants and incentives to building owners to support the purchase and installation of energy efficient technologies; Purchase vehicles for inspections to support compliance and enforcement; Are grants and subawards to permit holders/property owners eligible?","Please refer to the response to Question #27."]
[124,"2024-01-29","Eligibility","We’re planning on submitting a concept paper for Track 3.B to develop, adopt, and enforce a local Building Performance Standard with Energy Savings Equivalent to Zero Energy Codes. Our question: Would an initial phase of the BPS focused on benchmarking (e.g., year 1 and 2) be an eligible expense ahead of enforcing the energy reduction measures in years 3 and beyond? ","Please refer to the responses to Questions #1 and #38."]
[125,"2024-01-29","Concept Paper","[Summarized] Two cities are intending to submit a BPS proposal concept paper for DE-FOA-0003056. We are considering submitting a shared concept paper with a third-party energy efficiency program providing shared program management. Would a concept that directly supported two cities be consistent with the FOA or should we submit separately?","Please refer in part to the response to Question #76.  Prime recipients may subcontract per the guidelines in the FOA."]
[126,"2024-01-30","Eligibility","Is the authority to adopt building performance standards the same as the authority to adopt building codes, for the purposes of this grant?","Please refer to the response to Question #15."]
[127,"2024-01-30","Concept Paper","The jurisdiction I represent is interested in submitting a concept paper for the upcoming Feb. 9th deadline. If we submit a concept paper that gets approved for an April submission but decide to pursue funding in the following Fall 2024 round, would the same concept paper be accepted in the next round of funding? Or would it be better to just wait until the Fall to submit 1 concept paper if we think a Fall application would better fit our policy timeline/capacity?","Please refer to the response to Question #96."]
[128,"2024-02-01","Eligibility","Can multiple jurisdictions submit an application together, with one lead applicant? If so, how should the equivalency calculator be used for multiple jurisdictions?","Please refer to the response to Question #76."]
[129,"2024-02-01","Eligibility","Can an entity apply as a lead applicant in one concept paper and as a subrecipient/partner in another concept paper that are both the same subtopic?","No, the prime receipient cannot be a subrecipient within the same subtopic area. See Section III(F) of the FOA describes limitations on the number of Concept Papers and Full Applications eligible for review. "]
[130,"2024-02-01","Concept Paper","[Summarized] Is the list of key partner Jurisdictions and Organizations part of the two page limit for the concept paper?","Section IV(C) includes guidance on the Content and Form of the Concept Paper, and Section V(A)(i) includes Technical Review Criteria for Concept Papers. Per Section IV(C), each Concept Paper must be limited to a single project and should not exceed two pages in length."]
[131,"2024-02-02","Eligibility","Could cities under this same grant application vary in the final code package adoption between local governments? Alternatively, do the cities need to adopt the same code to the letter to collaborate on this grant proposal? ","Please refer to the response to Question #76."]
[132,"2024-02-02","Eligibility","[Summarized] It is understood that at least one jurisdiction would need to delegate the project management to a Prime if the Prime is not going to be a city government. Our NGO is being asked to coordinate an award on behalf of several cities - can one of these cities write a letter of delegation or does every single government entity involved have to sign over the delegation to manage such a project should we get funding?","The prime recipient under this FOA must be a State or unit of local government that has the authority to adopt building codes unless delegated as outlined in Section III(A)(i) of the FOA. Per Section III(A)(i) of the FOA, Entities that are not agencies within the applicant jurisdiction (e.g.: non-governmental organizations (NGOs), industry associations, etc.) are not eligible to be delegated as the prime applicant."]
[133,"2024-02-02","Concept Paper","Would we need letter(s) of delegation at Concept stage? Or can these be submitted with a full application in April?","Please refer to the response to Question #45."]
[134,"2024-02-06","Eligibility","[Summarized] We are applying for a grant to support BPS development and implementation. Given the BPS Technical Assistance team's prowess, I'm wondering could we list the TA group as a partner for that work?","The BPS Technical Assistance network is supported by DOE-funded FFRDCs. Per FOA Section II(B)(i) of the FOA, FFRDCs involved in the BPS TA network are funded independently of the remainder of the project team, and should therefore not be included as subrecipients on individual applications."]
[135,"2024-02-01","Eligibility","States are not eligible for Topic Area 1, correct?","Topic Area 1 of the FOA is written specifically for local governments with the authority to adopt building energy codes."]
[136,"2024-02-01","Technical Topics","[Summarized] Is equivalence determined only by the prescriptive path or is the performance path also considered?","Per Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA, the proposed code must deliver equivalent or greater energy savings through requirements that are measurable, verifiable, and enforceable. The equivalence methodology is documented in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA and the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange. "]
[137,"2024-02-01","Technical Topics","If you are implementing a BPS that, by law, requires reducing energy use by defined percentages over progressive time increments, and would ultimately require net zero by a certain time, do you still need to calculate equivalence? Would the required reduction in energy usage stated in the law be enough to compare energy savings?","Per Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA, an application must demonstrate equivalent or greater energy savings in line with the Subtopic Area or request assistance from DOE in conducting that determination during the application eligibility review. The equivalence methodology is documented in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA and the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange."]
[138,"2024-02-01","Technical Topics","Is Equivalence across all building types, or within building types?","Per the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange, Section 4 and Section 5, equivalence is calculated across all building types covered by the current code and the qualified code, compared to the building types covered by the proposed code. "]
[139,"2024-02-01","Technical Topics","If there are voluntary (not mandatory) parts of the building code that encourage ZEC, can that be considered qualifying for the ZEC category?","Codes must be measurable, verifiable, and enforceable. Codes that do not contain compliance and enforcement elements are not eligible per Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA. While the zero energy code may have voluntary portions, the mandatory portions must be the equivalent energy savings requirement.  Please refer to the response to Question #1. "]
[140,"2024-02-01","Technical Topics","Do energy savings get quantified based on onsite energy reductions, or do they also include renewable energy procurements or RECs which are permitted in the IECC appendices?","Energy savings from efficiency attributes are considered separately from the procurement of renewable energy generation, per the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange, Section 4 and Section 5."]
[141,"2024-02-01","Technical Topics","Does equivalence to zero code CC/RC require equivalence with annual net on- and off-site renewable energy for a net site EUI of zero at the building meter?","Please refer to the response to Question #140."]
[142,"2024-02-01","Technical Topics","The topic area 3 calculator is actually quite simple.  You are talking about a lot of calculations--are you simply describing what the calculator does, or does the jurisidciton need to do additional calcualtions in addition to the calculator. In addition, the Topic 3 calculator only shows yes/no for equivalence. does a jurisdiction only need to state that (and provide the calculator with inputs/outputs), or actually calculate savings and provide a number.","Since equivalence is an application requirement, DOE provided simple calculators to support the process for potential applicants. For topic area 3, only the cacluations that are represented in the calculator are required as outlined in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA. The impact of the proposed code is a FOA merit review criteria, outlined in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA."]
[143,"2024-02-01","Eligibility","For BPS, does the jurisdiction have to have the LMC in place before they can apply?","Please refer to the response to Question #20."]
[144,"2024-02-01","Technical Topics","[Summarized] For jurisdictions where IECC or ASHRAE 90.1 are not adopted, are we allowed use the equivalency calculators, or are those only useable for jurisdictions that currently have IECC and ASHRAE 90.1?","Per Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA, applicants may choose to use the provided calculators, request support from DOE, or conduct their own calculations. Input data for the equivalence calculators and required input data for custom calculations are detailed in Section 3 of the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange. For jurisdictions that elect to submit custom calculations, the Equivalence Methodology document explains how to proceed with the calculations in Section 4 for new construction and major renovations and Section 5 for existing buildings using Section 3 data sources. "]
[145,"2024-02-01","Technical Topics","Can you elaborate on the extent of DOE technical support for custom codes relating to equivalence calculator if requested? i.e. Will DOE be able to support the building simulation work to prove equivalence OR providing data sources for standards inputs (population/building stock #, etc.)","Data sources required for the equivalence calculation are provided in Section 3 of the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange. DOE can conduct the equivalence calculation on behalf of an applicant as part of the eligibility evaluation for full applications. Submission requirements for applicants requesting that DOE conduct the calcuation are outlined in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA. "]
[146,"2024-02-01","Application Content/Format","[Summarized] Can the Subtopic Area be changed between the submission of the Concept Paper and the subsequent Full Application? ","Yes. While an applicant must select a Topic Area and Subtopic Area for the submission of a Concept Paper, the Full Application may be submitted to a different Subtopic Area than the Concept Paper, though the Topic Area may not change. Please refer to the response to Question #35 for additional information on Concept Papers. "]
[147,"2024-02-01","Technical Topics","Can you speak more to BPS that use emissions only?","The Topic Area 3 Calculator template and Section 5 of the companion Equivalence Methodology document, both on Infrastructure Exchange, provide calculation pathways for emissions-based proposals for existing buildings. "]
[148,"2024-02-14","Technical Topics","[Summarized]: What should a jurisdiction do to demonstrate equivalence in an application seeking to implement a previously adopted code? ","A jurisdiction submitting an application to implement an already adopted code must still demonstrate equivalence relative to the code specified in the application's Subtopic Area using the methodology, as outlined in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA. The equivalence calculation will consider the previously adopted version of the code as the baseline and compare the energy savings from the already adopted code in the proposal to the corresponding statute-specified latest model code or zero energy code in line with the Topic Area and Subtopic Area of submission. The calculations outlined in the companion Equivalence Methodology document provided on Infrastructure Exchange and specified in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA do not change. "]
[149,"2024-02-15","Eligibility","[Summarized] If a locality does not have the authority to adopt their own energy codes, are they eligible to apply for an implementation project, where they update an existing building to meet their State's current Energy codes?","Per Section III(A)(i) of the FOA, the prime recipient must be a State, or unit of local government that has the authority to adopt building codes.  If the State has code making authority and receives an award, a State could partner with a local jurisdiction on implemetnation, workforce, compliance, or enforcement."]
[150,"2024-02-18","Application Content/Format","Can a subrecipient oversee the work of subcontractors that would subcontract directly with the subrecipient, and can the budget for those subcontractors be included in the main subrecipients budget? The prime (a state agency) would prefer to have one entity (the \"main\" subrecipient) responsible for deliverables, rather than having multiple subrecipients they would be directly responsible for, and have that single subrecipient oversee the team of contractors that have been identified in advance. ","The prime recipient is the responsible authority regarding the settlement and satisfaction of all contractual and administrative issues. The specific terms and conditions of an award are determined during award negotiations after a successful application has been selected by DOE. The prime receipient determines the subrecipients and such subcontracts and the specific terms and conditions of the award then flows through the prime to all subrecipients."]
[151,"2024-02-18","Application Content/Format","The FOA (page 21, Table 4) states a 5-page limit for “Community Partnership Documentation” – does that include all letters from community entities? Meaning only 5 letters (1-page limit each) can be submitted?  Or if not, please provide guidance on what should be included in those 5 pages, if not the letters themselves. ","Please see Section IV(D)(v) of the FOA for further guidance on Community Partnership Documentation. "]
[152,"2024-02-18","Application Content/Format","Can you provide more detail on when the “Proposed Building Energy Code” (pg 38) requirement applies, and specifically what details should be included in that document, particularly when exact language does not exist? ","Proposed codes must meet the equivalent energy savings requirement when compared to the relevant latest model code or zero energy code that is a qualifying building energy code, and must provide the required documentation to demonstrate equivalence. The proposed code that the eligibile entity intends to adopt must be outlined in the application in order to prove eligibilty.  The equivalence methodology is documented in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA and the companion Equivalence Methodology document on Infrastructure Exchange.\n\nDOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the applicant. See also the FOA Section III Eligibility Information."]
[153,"2024-02-21","Technical Topics","[Summarized] Our state adopted the latest model code after the FOA was published. Can you assist with updating the baseline in the calculator, or assist with the equivalence calculation prior to or after submission?","Please refer to the response to Question #148."]
[154,"2024-02-21","Eligibility","What if a state moves to 2021 IECC with Amendments that weaken the code? Has there been guidance provided on that?  ","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[155,"2024-02-23","Eligibility","[Summarized ]Would a local government that cannot enact traditional building codes, but can enact innovative codes approaches including building performance standards, be eligible for this funding opportunity?","Please refer to the response to Question #15"]
[156,"2024-02-26","Eligibility","For applications that propose activities in multiple jurisdictions, is each jurisdiction required to have the authority to adopt building codes?","In accordance with Section III(A) of the FOA, eligible Grantees are defined as States and units of local government that have the authority to adopt building codes. As further provided in Section III(A)(ii), the prime recipient must be a State, or unit of local government that has the authority to adopt building codes, unless delegated as specified in Section III(A)(i). Entities that are not agencies within the applicant jurisdiction (e.g.: non-governmental organizations (NGOs), industry associations, etc.) are not eligible to be delegated as the prime applicant. See the FOA Section III(A)(i). \n\nIf an application includes several jurisdictions with the authority to adopt building codes, each of those jurisdictions must ensure the appropriate delegation as outlined in Section III(A)(i) of the FOA."]
[157,"2024-02-27","Application Content/Format","The FOA states that the maximum period of performance is 9 years, and that the project can be divided into budget periods.  A template is provided for a project with (up to) 3 budget periods, and one for 5 budget periods.  Is there any limitation on how long the budget periods can be (e.g., no more than 3 years, etc)?","Per Section II(A)(ii) of the FOA, awards will run a maximum of nine (9) years in length and will consist of one or more budget periods ending no later than September 30, 2034. The project period and budget periods of individual awards will be decided upon during award negotiations after a successful application has been selected by DOE."]
[158,"2024-02-27","Application Content/Format","The \"Budget Justification Workbook\" is listed in the FOA on Table 4, and templates are included on the Infrastructure Exchange website. However, in the description for \"Budget Justification Workbook\" on page 31, it says \"Applicants selected for negotiation must complete the Budget Justification Workbook.\"  Can you confirm that the Budget Justification Workbook must be uploaded for an application to be complete, or provide further guidance on these instructions?","Per Table 4 in Section IV(D)(i) of the FOA, the Budget Justification Workbook is an application requirement. Per Section IV(D)(xxi), applicants selected for negotiation must provide a separate budget justification for each subrecipient that is expected to perform work estimated to be more than $250,000 or 25% of the total work effort, whichever is less."]
[159,"2024-02-29","Technical Topics","For projects electing Option 2 for the Equivalency Calculator and Equivalency Analysis requirement, is a document listing the inputs all that is required for the “equivalency analysis” proposal component? Will the application be complete if the “Equivalence Calculator” component is left blank in the full proposal? Please advise if any additional documentation is required beyond the input list for projects electing Option 2. ","Per Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA, applicants seeking DOE support in conducting the equivalence calculation must provide the informaion described under Option 2, as their equivalence documentation with the full application. The required Equivalence Analysis document submission is listed in Section IV(D)(i), Table 4, and the list of required information/data inputs to be included in that submission is detailed in Section IV(D)(vi), which for Option 2 are the same for Topic Area 2 and Topic Area 3. Sufficient detail must be provided in the submission for DOE to be able to complete the equivalence calculation."]
[160,"2024-03-01","Application Content/Format","For the Current and Pending Support documentation, we wanted to confirm that: (a), this is only in reference to federal funding for RD&D, and (b) that if we do not have funding that is applicable here, do we still need to submit a certification or letter stating that we don't currently manage this kind of funding? ","Section IV(D)(xii) of the FOA includes detail on the requirements for Current and Pending Support, which as defined in that section includes RD&D efforts. Section IV(D)(xvii) of the FOA includes guidance on documentation if the applicant or project team member has other active awards of federal funds."]
[161,"2024-03-02","Due Dates","Is it too late for a municipality to apply for this funding? I see it's past the date, but I thought I would inquire in case exceptions were being made or the date getting extended possibly.\nAlso, if the window is closed will it open up again at some point?","Per Section I(B) of the FOA, this Funding Opportunity Announcement may remain open for up to 18 months, with review cycles occurring approximately every 6 months, while funding lasts. The “rolling” nature of this announcement is meant to allow time for effective teams to be developed and strategies identified to successfully meet the goals outlined in the FOA. DOE will announce additional deadlines for future rounds of funding pending funding availability.\n\nRound 2 submissions will be accepted under record/FOA number DE-RD2-0003056. The application deadline for Round 2 Concept Papers is May 31, 2024 by 5:00 p.m. ET. Applicants must submit a Concept Paper by this deadline to be eligible to submit a Full Application in the second funding rounds."]
[162,"2024-03-04","Eligibility","I am interested in learning if we are able to receive funding as an Improvement district for houses we are selling/renting that meet the DOE ZERH certification to help off set some of the costs incurred by the improvement district. ","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[163,"2024-03-08","Application Content/Format","Regarding the Community Partnership documentation: does DOE expect the community partnership docs to be legally binding? If not, will you expect awarded entities to eventually submit official partnership agreements between community partners and lead entities at some point?","Section IV(D)(v) of the FOA includes guidance on Community Partnership Documentation."]
[164,"2024-03-15","Eligibility","We are looking into building a new jail facility, would this type of facility be eligible for this grant?","Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[165,"2024-03-15","Eligibility","Our city is a home rule municipality that has the authority to adopt its own building codes. Staff departments implement and enforce codes after City Council adopts them. Does the DOE consider both City Council and City staff to be the same agency or separate ones? Is a written delegation required by City Council or Council representative to designate staff as the prime applicant?","Section III(A)(i) of the FOA provides information on the Delegation of Authority. It is incumbent on the eligible entity and designated applicant to ensure the validity of the delegation under the relevant State and/or local authorities, and to specify which specific project activities will be delegated."]
[166,"2024-03-18","Application Content/Format","How should concept papers and full applications be submitted for Round 2 of funding?","Note that due to system limitations, submissions for Round 2 Concept Papers and Full Applications will be accepted in Infrastructure Exchange under a separate record/FOA number from Round 1 submissions:\n\nRound 1 submissions will be accepted under record/FOA number DE-FOA-0003056. Round 1 is still open for Full Application submissions in Infrastructure Exchange under record/FOA number DE-FOA-0003056; however, the Round 1 Concept Paper due date was February 9, 2024. The Round 1 Full Application deadline remains April 30, 2024 at 5:00 PM ET.\n\nRound 2 submissions will be accepted under record/FOA number DE-RD2-0003056. The application deadline for Round 2 Concept Papers is May 31, 2024 by 5:00 p.m. ET. Applicants must submit a Concept Paper by this deadline to be eligible to submit a Full Application in the second funding rounds."]
[167,"2024-03-20","Eligibility","[Summarized] Can an equivalence determination be made without specific proposed building energy code language?","Per Section IV(D)(i) of the FOA, for Topic Areas 2 and 3, the applicant must submit according to the applicable direction in Section IV(D)(vi), the completed Equivalence Calculator, the completed evaluation pursuant to the Equivalence Methodology, or the requisite inputs for analysis. "]
[168,"2024-03-20","Eligibility","[Summarized] Can DOE make an assessment or determination for eligibility based on the specific information that is included in this email?","DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the applicant."]
[169,"2024-03-25","Application Content/Format","Under Technical Volume Content Requirements, the Workplan includes three \"plans\" that are capitalized as if they are separate documents: Community Benefits Plan, Adoption Plan, and the Implementation and Compliance Plan. We are aware the Community Benefits Plan is a separate document. Are the Adoption and Implementation and Compliance Plans separate documents, or included in the narrative? ","Per Section IV(D)(ii) of the FOA, the Technical Volume must address the technical review criteria as discussed in Section V of the FOA. The Technical Volume includes a Workplan portion, which must include information about the Applicant's plans for adoption, implementation, and compliance activities. Note that the technical review criteria described in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA include evaluation metrics for these activities."]
[170,"2024-03-27","Other","[Summarized] Will there be the possibility to reallocate funds from the submitted budget at the Go/No-Go review points, if the DOE recommends redirection of work? ","Possibly - major changes in scope, a large budget shift, a new budget category, and changes in personnel plus other items may all trigger a grant modification. Circumstances will be evaluated on a case-by case basis, and DOE staff will assist grantees in navigating potential options and approvals."]
[171,"2024-03-29","Technical Topics","[Summarizd] Our State is applying for funding in Section 3B and intends to put their Building Performance Standard (BPS) through a stakeholder guided process and it will have to be passed through legislation. We want to get clarification to confirm that the Equivalency Calculator will be submitted on a provisional basis, pending the outcome of those processes and with the understanding from the applicant that continued funding is based on the final BPS design meeting the requirements of the equivalency calculator.","Zero code equivalence is met in accordance with the required equivalence methodology as described in Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA and the corresponding Equivalence Methodology. Future circumstances will be evaluated at that time when all facts are present, and DOE staff will assist in navigating potential options and approvals. "]
[172,"2024-03-29","Application Content/Format","Is the Technical Volume the same thing as the Adoption, Implementation, and Compliance Plans noted as Criterion 2 in the Technical Review Criteria?","Please refer to the response to Question #169."]
[173,"2024-03-29","Application Content/Format","Are you expecting the Community Partnership Documentation to be a narrative or just the letters themselves?","Section IV(D)(v) of the FOA includes guidance on Community Partnership Documentation."]
[174,"2024-03-29","Application Content/Format","I see in 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E that contingency is allowed. My budget for software development in the Budget Justification workbook is going in the Contractual tab for the contractors involved. The contingency is in the same category of expense (i.e.,  contractors). Does it go in the same place in the Budget Justification workbook under a new line called Contingency or is there a different spot for contingency?","Section IV(D)(ix) of the FOA includes guidance on the Budget Justification Workbook document. Note that the technical review criteria described in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA include evaluation metrics for this document."]
[175,"2024-03-29","Eligibility","[Summarized] Can the same entity apply for the same Subtopic Area in different funding rounds, assuming the proposed projects are distinct activities?","Yes. While an applicant may not submit multiple applications to the same Subtopic Area in a single round of the FOA, they may submit an application to the same Subtopic Area in successive FOA rounds provided that the applications represent distinct and unique activities and projects. "]
[176,"2024-03-29","Application Content/Format","If we submit the Topic Area 3 Calculator with the application, is additional technical documentation necessary as part of the Equivalency Analysis?","Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA outlines the two pathways for submission of the Equivalence Analysis and supporting documentation. For applicants considering submitting a completed calculator or analysis in line with the Equivalence Methodology, a list of submission requirements including documentation of the proposed code and relevant amendments, is provided in the \"Documentation Requirements\" sections at the end of Section 4 and Section 5 of the Equivalence Methodology. "]
[177,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","[Summarized] Does DOE have additional guidance on eligible use of funds? ","Please refer to the reponse to Question #27."]
[178,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Which section(s) of the Technical Volume is best to include the Adoption, Implementation and Compliance Plans?","Please refer to the reponse to Question #169."]
[179,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Is there a checklist of all the documents we need to submit?","Section IV(D)(i) of the FOA provides a list of Application Requirements in Table 4."]
[180,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","I did not receive any feedback on my concept paper. Should I expect anything from DOE?","The \"Applicant User Guide\" (the first link at this URL: https://infrastructure-exchange.energy.gov/Manuals.aspx), specifically pages 74-76, includes instructions for navigating to additional detail on your concept paper submission. If you are still unable to find this feedback for your submission, please let us know."]
[181,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","What creates a sub recipient vs a partner? Do partners receive funding? Would conusltants be considered sub recipients?","Please see Section IV(D) of the FOA for information regarding content of the Full Application. Specifically, see Sections IV(D)(ii), IV(D)(iv), IV(D)(v), IV(D)(ix), IV(D)(xx), IV(D)(xxi), IV(D)(xxii) for information regarding subrecipients and partners.\n\nHowever, DOE will not make entity determinations for potential applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision whether to include an entity in an application budget in response to this FOA lies solely with the applicant. See also FOA Section III Eligibility Information."]
[182,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Letters of commitment or moreso for subrecipients that will receive funding, correct? Whereas Community Partnership Documentation is moreso partners that might not be receiving funding","Section IV(D)(iv) of the FOA includes guidance on Letters of Commitment, Section IV(D)(v) includes guidance on Community Partnership Documentation."]
[183,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Can you please confirm we can just use the Excel Calculator and not the full equivalence calculation book? Should we include additional references like language from the code?","Additional information on equivalence is available in the recorded webinar and slides provided here: https://infrastructure-exchange.energy.gov/Default.aspx#FoaIda25503b3-faa7-4a9e-8216-579246093ec7"]
[184,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Is there a template for the Delegation of Authority?","There is not a template for Delegation of Authority. Per Section III(A)(i) of the FOA, it will be incumbent on the eligible entity and designated applicant to ensure the validity of the delegation under the relevant State and/or local authorities, and to specify which specific project activities will be delegated."]
[185,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","where is the best resource on subrecipient requirements?","The FOA provides guidance on recipients and subrecipients, throughout all sections. Please also refer to the response to Question #104."]
[186,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Is there a required template for the Community Benefits Plan?","There is no required template for the Community Benefits Plan. Sections I(D) and IV(D)(xiii) of the FOA include guidance on the content for a Community Benefits Plan."]
[187,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Is this somewhere we could ask questions about the submission of the financial portion of the application? Originally it looked like we were supposed to submit everything into Infrastructure eXCHANGE, but in a recent email I saw reference to the PAGE system, so I was hoping to get clarification there. Thanks.","PAGE is the system that is used for Formula Funding awards (the ALRD is the guiding document for that). Infrastructure Exchange is the system that is used for the competitive FOA. Please refer to the second bullet point on the cover page of the FOA document for DE-FOA-0003056 submission requirements.","\n "]
[188,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Is the Technical Volume/Project Narrative the same as the Adoption, Compliance, and Enforcement Plan noted in the Evaluation Criteria? The Adoption, Compliance, and Enforcement Plan is not a separate document like the Community Benefits Plan, correct?","Please refer to the reponse to Question #169."]
[189,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Can the same organizations that are providing Letters of Commitment also contribute to the Community Partnership Letter - or should there be no overlap between those letters?","There may be cases where overlap between entities exists. Please also refer to the response to Question #182."]
[190,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","what if we are submitting for a BPS subtopic b ZEC and the ordinance is passed in the future but loses the renewable energy component of the ordinance","Please refer to the reponse to Question #171."]
[191,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Does adoption of the 2024 IECC qualify for funding acceptance?","Please refer to the reponse to Question #21."]
[192,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","For those of us pursuing a BPS from a state level - our current code adopting bodies often lack the legal authority to adopt a code of this nature (pertaining to existing buildings vs. new construction). How much detail would DOE like to see in the full application regarding the process of introducing new state legislation to give our SBCCs this new authority?","DOE would like to see as much information as possible to evaluate your proposal. Applicants should clearly describe their plan, noting the technical review criteria described in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA.\n"]
[193,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Our local government has strict procurement requirements regarding working with partners and organizations. How can we specify partners and CBOs in the grant application if we are not allowed to engage in formal partnerships at this point of the project?","Please refer to the reponse to Question #104."]
[194,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Can you please highlight the difference between “Letters of Commitment” vs “partnership documentation”?","Please refer to the reponse to Question #182."]
[195,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Would you like to see letters of support form legislators at the full application stage?","General letters of support from legislators are not required. If a Delegation of Authority is required, reference Section III(A)(i) of the FOA for guidance."]
[196,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Is the partnership documentation letters of support? and then Letters of commitment are people who are actually working with us/doing the work? or do they not want letters of support at all? just letters of commitment?","Please refer to the reponse to Question #182."]
[197,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Will another round of this FOA be eligible next year with around the same due dates for Concept Paper and Full Application?","Per Section I(B) of the FOA, this Funding Opportunity Announcement may remain open for up to 18 months, while funding lasts."]
[198,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Is there a limit on how many letters of support can be submitted? Do these letters count toward the 5 page Community Partnership Documentation limit?","Section IV(D)(v) of the FOA includes guidance on Community Partnership Documentation."]
[199,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","Question on Round 2: if we don't know the outcome of the full application for round 1 before concept papers are due for round 2, how should we proceed? if we dont get selected for round 1, we would want to alter the app for round 2 based on feedback from round 1 to make the app more competitive. but submit the same concept paper","DOE is not in a position to make recommendations on application strategy. The decision whether to submit a concept paper and application in response to this FOA lies solely with the applicant.  DOE is hoping to provide quick feedback on applications that do not meet the FOA criteria that can inform the Round 2 concept paper deadlines."]
[200,"2024-03-28","Application Content/Format","In terms of the Delegation of authority, does the DOE have a definition for \"agency\"? We are unsure if DOE considers City Council (who adopts codes) and staff (who implements the codes) are considered the same agency","Section III(A)(i) of the FOA includes guidance on Delegation of Authority."]
[201,"2024-04-02","Application Content/Format","Can a municipality applying for round 1 of the grant apply for round 2 and receive funding for an entirely different and distinct project, but under the same topic area?","Please refer to the response to Question #175."]
[202,"2024-04-02","Application Content/Format","Will applicants submitting for round 1 be notified of their application decision prior to the concept paper deadline for round 2? E.g., if a city was encouraged to apply for round 1 from their concept paper, but their final application is rejected, can they apply for round 2 with the same project as round 1 and make tweaks to align more with the requirements of the grant program? Would it be recommended to submit a concept paper for round 2 in case the full application for round 1 is rejected but the agency isn’t notified prior to the round 2 concept paper deadline?","Please refer to the response to Question #199."]
[203,"2024-04-03","Application Content/Format","Who should the Letters of Commitment be addressed to? ","Letters of Commitment can be addressed to the applying entity or to DOE, at the discretion of the organization writing the letter. Additional guidance on Letters of Commitment can be found in Section IV(D)(iv) of the FOA."]
[204,"2024-04-08","Other","Are we able to reserve some of the grant award for future software payments after the grant period of 3 years is up?","Section IV(J)(x) of the FOA details requirements for Invoice Review and Approval. The project period and budget periods of individual awards will be decided upon during award negotiations after a successful application has been selected by DOE."]
[205,"2024-04-09","Application Content/Format","In our own budget workbook, should we include an in-depth breakdown of subrecipient budget or just a total sum going to subrecipients? We understand if awarded we’ll need to provide subrecipient budget workbook. Just wondering how much detail you’d like in our application budget. ","Section IV(D)(ix) of the FOA describes requirements for the Budget Justification. Section IV(D)(xxi) of the FOA describes requirements for the Subrecipient Budget Justification upon selection for negotiation. The Subrecipient Budget Justification must include the same justification information described in the “Budget Justification” section. Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA describes how the application will be reviewed, specifically regarding Project Management."]
[206,"2024-04-10","Concept Paper","Can an applicant that submitted a concept paper in Round 1 and received a response of Encouraged to Apply, choose to delay applying and resubmit as part of Round 2 in order to develop a stronger application?","Please refer to the response to Question #166. In order to be eligible to submit an application for funding in Round 2, applicants must submit a Concept Paper under Round 2, regardless of whether they submitted a concept paper in Round 1. "]
[207,"2024-04-11","Application Content/Format","If our grant application got denied in the first round, if we would be able to apply for funds again in the fall when there's a second round of applications due?","In order to be eligible to submit an application for funding in Round 2, applicants must submit a Concept Paper under Round 2, regardless of whether they submitted a concept paper in Round 1. Round 2 submissions will be accepted under record/FOA number DE-RD2-0003056. The application deadline for Round 2 Concept Papers is May 31, 2024 by 5:00 p.m. ET. Applicants must submit a Concept Paper by this deadline to be eligible to submit a Full Application in the second funding rounds."]
[208,"2024-04-15","Application Content/Format","Can the performance period for topic area 3 be more than 3 years if decided during award negotiations, or is it a max of 36 months for topic area 3? ","Section II(A)(i), Table 3 of the FOA includes anticipated award information, including anticipated period of performance for each Subtopic Area. Please also refer to the response to Question #157."]
[209,"2024-04-17","Application Content/Format","Our team was curious how we might deviate from our concept paper, for example we are looking at including additional expenses related to workforce development and an increased total budget request, is this okay?","Details submitted in the Full Application may differ from the information provided in the Concept Paper, provided that the Topic Area under which the Applicant is submiting does not change between the Concept Paper and the Full Application. Per Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA, applications will be evaluated against the criterion of the Topic Area in which it was submitted. "]
[210,"2024-04-17","Technical Topics","We have 2 scenarios for equivalence calculators, should I upload 2 separate excel files? I don’t see a place to submit additional documentation.","Per Section IV(D)(i) of the FOA, each Full Application must be limited to a single project, falling within one Subtopic Area. Per Section IV(D)(vi) of the FOA, Applicants must demonstrate equivalent or greater energy savings for the specified code using either the equivalence calculator provided or by following the specified methodology. \n\nIn this case, the Applicant should submit the equivalence documentation for the proposed policy the jurisdiction intends to pursue for evaluation or equivalence and eligibility.  Only one equivalence calculation will be accepted that is reflective of the methodology specified by the FOA and the proposed code. "]
[211,"2024-04-17","Application Content/Format","(Summarized] I don’t believe we need to receive delegation of authority. ","Section III(A)(i) of the FOA provides information on the Delegation of Authority, where relevant. To be an eligible entiy under the FOA, the applicant must have code making authority and be a State (including Territory) or local jurisdiction.  It will be incumbent on the eligible entity and designated applicant, if needed, to ensure the validity of the delegation under the relevant State and/or local authorities, and to specify which specific project activities will be delegated.  DOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. "]
[212,"2024-04-19","Application Content/Format","We are filling out the budget workbook which only has 5 budget periods, but our proposal has six periods. It says in the instructions to reach out to EERE for guidance about adding columns to the form; can you please provide instructions on how to add columns? ","DOE does not currently have a budget workbook with more than 5 budget periods. For the application, DOE suggests that applicants structure the length of their budget periods to fit within the confines of the currently available budget workbook. If the project is selected for award, we can deal with any necessary changes to budget period length/budget workbooks at that time during negotiations."]
[213,"2024-04-20","Application Content/Format","Section IV(D)(i), Table 4: Application Requirements limits Community Partnership Documentation to 5 pages. Section IV(D)(v) limits each individual Community Partnership Documentation to 1 page. If we have more than five community partners, should we only include five letters to comply with the 5-page limit?","Please refer to the response to Question #151."]
[214,"2024-04-22","Application Content/Format","Can you confirm the SF forms we are to submit are the SF-424 and the SF-LLL, and the SF-424a is not required?","Section IV(D)(i) of the FOA provides a list of Application Requirements in Table 4, including the SF-424 and SF-LLL. The SF-424a is not an application requirement."]
[215,"2024-04-22","Application Content/Format","The format of the forms on exchange and grants.gov doesn’t allow us to edit the forms. Requires Adobe 8 or greater. The attached screenshot shows the error message. Can you upload these forms in a different format so we are able to edit them?","Compatability files have been added to the templates in Infrastructure Exchange to aid in filling out these forms."]
[216,"2024-04-22","Application Content/Format","This is a question for the 2nd round responses for the IRA codes FOA (DE-RD2-0003056).  It is stated that \"Jurisdictions may submit multiple applications under this FOA, but only a single application for each Subtopic Area.\" (page  9 of the FOA).\n\nCan you clarify if this 2nd round will count as a new and separate FOA than the first round, and therefore, a jurisdiction would be allowed to submit an application for a Subtopic Area for which it has already submitted an application in the first round?  E.g., if a jurisdiction submitted an application under Topic 3, subtopic B in round one, could the jurisdiction submit another application, for a separate and distinct project, under the same Topic/subtopic in round two?","Please refer to the responses to questions #166 and #175."]
[217,"2024-04-23","Application Content/Format","We are applying under Topic Area #3, Subtopic A, which has an Anticipated Period of Performance of “Up to 3 years”. Would that 3 years begin as soon as we’d receive funding, or could our 3 year period of performance run from, say Q3 2025 to Q3 2028 if it closer aligns with our projections?","Per Section VI(A)(iv) of the FOA, successful applicants will enter into negotiations. The project period and budget periods of individual awards will be decided upon during that time."]
[218,"2024-04-23","Application Content/Format","In our Concept Paper submission, we estimated a budget of $1,000,000. Are we required to stay at that budget for our Application, or can we apply for a larger amount with our updated budget projections for the program?","Please refer to the response to question #209."]
[219,"2024-04-26","Application Content/Format","Is ‘DE-FOA-0003056 Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) Assistance for the Adoption of the Latest and Zero Building Energy Codes’ subject to the Uniform Guidance under 2 CFR 200? Items of particular interest are procurement standards under Subpart D, and limitations on fixed price subawards under 2 CFR 200.333?","Per Section I(E) of the FOA, awards made under DE-FOA-0003056 are subject to 2 CFR 200."]
[220,"2024-05-02","Application Content/Format","If a municipal “agency with the authority to adopt building codes” wishes to have another agency in the same municipality perform work under this agreement by conducting an intra-agency cost transfer is the other agency considered a subrecipient? For example, if a building department wishes to have the community college which is part of the same municipality perform work, is the community college a subrecipient? If the college is viewed by DOE as a subrecipient and the “agency with the authority to adopt building codes” wishes the community college to undertake more than 50% of the value of the grant, should the “agency with the authority to adopt building codes” delegate the specific goals of the grant proposal to the community college, and the college then propose to DOE as the prime recipient for the project, with the building department as a subrecipient?","Per Section III(A) of the FOA, eligible Grantees are defined as States and units of local government that have the authority to adopt building codes. Per Section III(A)(i) of the FOA, the agency with the authority to adopt building codes may provide formal documentation of delegation of authority to another agency to proceed as the prime applicant on the jurisdiction’s submission. Per Section III(A)(i) of the FOA, institutes of higher education are eligible to participate as a subrecipient of this FOA."]
[221,"2024-05-02","Application Content/Format","The FOA states \"Entities may submit a maximum of one concept paper and full application per subtopic area.\" Does this restriction apply per round or across all three rounds? For example, if a city submitted a concept paper in round 1 but did not submit a full application, would they still be eligible to submit a concept paper under the same subtopic in round 2? ","Please refer to the response to Question #175."]
[222,"2024-05-06","Eligibility","Federal agencies are eligible applicants?","No. Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[223,"2024-05-06","Eligibility","The building/project can be located outside the United States?","No. Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[224,"2024-05-06","Other","This FOA-0003056 is related to the AFFECT grant application?","No. Please refer to the response to Question #1."]
[225,"2024-05-09","Concept Paper","Do concept papers have to be submitted by the primary applicant or can a secondary applicant submit the concept paper in infrastructure.-exchange?","Per the Cover Page and Section VI(B)(i)(1) of the FOA, applicants must must register with and submit application materials through Infrastructure eXCHANGE. Applicants must designate primary and backup points-of-contact in Infrastructure eXCHANGE with whom SCEP will communicate to conduct award negotiations."]
[226,"2024-05-22","Eligibility","Does an applicant's plan need to support adoption specifically by the prime applicant (assuming the prime applicant has authority to adopt building codes), or can the prime applicant use the funds to support adoption, implementation and enforcement efforts by many states and/or local governments that have authority to adopt the relevant codes? ","Per FOA Section III(A)(ii), the prime recipient must be a State, or unit of local government that has the authority to adopt building codes, unless delegated as outlined in Section III(A)(i) of the FOA. Eligible activities are described under Topic Areas in Section I(B) of the FOA.\n\nDOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the applicant."]
[227,"2024-05-22","Eligibility","If the plan creates resources that the prime applicant as well as other states and or cities would adopt, implement, and enforce, will the impact from these other states and/or cities be considered in the merit of the application, or would the impact only from the prime applicant jurisdiction itself be considered? ","Technical review criteria are described in Section V(A)(ii) of the FOA."]
[228,"2024-06-12","Concept Paper","Can the prime applicant on the full application be a different entity than the prime applicant on the concept paper?","Per FOA Section III(A)(ii), the prime recipient must be a State, or unit of local government that has the authority to adopt building codes, unless delegated as outlined in Section III(A)(i) of the FOA.\n\nIf an eligible Applicant is included in the Concept Paper as a subrecipient and is changed to the prime recipient for the purposes of the Full Application, the Applicant will need to contact the Infrastructure eXCHANGE Help Desk to make the switch. An eligible entity must be the Prime Applicant for the Full Application. "]
[229,"2024-06-14","Eligibility","Will DOE accept proposals under grant opportunity DE-FOA-0003056 that are not \"code-specific\", but instead fund activities to help implement statewide Building Energy Performance Standards (BEPS) through other means, such as decarbonization planning, and support for implementation of BEPS regulations?","Please refer to the response to Question #1. \n\nDOE will not make eligibility determinations for potential applicants prior to the date on which applications to this FOA must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FOA lies solely with the applicant."]
[230,"2024-07-03","Eligibility","If the Foreign Work Waiver is rejected, does that disqualify our full application, or will DOE consider the backup plan using domestic staff?","Section IV(J)(iii) and Appendix A of the FOA outline requirements for submitting a Foreign Work Waiver as well as consequences for a Failure to Comply. The merit of alternative staffing plans should the waiver not be approved would be evaluated through the Merit Review process along with the rest of the application. "]
[231,"2024-07-03","Application Content/Format","The FOA lists an Open-source Software Distribution Plan as a full application requirement “if applicable” on page 22. However there is no corresponding section or description in Section IV(D) or elsewhere in the FOA. How does one determines if this requirement applies?","Section IV(D)(i), Table 4 includes both application requirements and items that are required only if applicable. If the applicant is proposing an open-source software solution, a corresponding distribution plan must be submitted to detail how the open-source software would be managed, licensed, and other relevant best practices for open-source software. If open-source software is not a component of the proposal, this element is not required for the application. "]
[232,"2024-07-03","Application Content/Format","The FOA lists a Budget Justification Workbook as a full application requirement on page 22. However Section IV(D)(ix) contradicts this by stating \"Applicants selected for negotiation must complete the Budget Justification Workbook..” on page 31.Does this requirement apply at the full application stage or negotiation stage?","Please refer to the response to Question #158."]
[233,"2024-07-08","Other","For the Full Application, does the Principal Investigator have to be from the prime applicant’s organization or can they be someone associated with a sub recipient?","Per Section VI(A)(iv) of the FOA, the prime recipient is responsible for award negotiations and accessing FedConnect. If selected, DOE enters into negotiates with the prime recipient, who is responsible for all aspects and shares information with their subrecipients."]
[234,"2024-07-26","Other","Are there any limits on how much of the grant the prime recipient must spend internally vs. flowing through to sub -recipients? For example, can the prime recipient spend 10% of the total grant within their agency and provide the other 90% of the grant to eligible sub-recipients to achieve the goals of the project? ","Per Section II(B)(ii) of the FOA, DOE will provide financial support to the prime recipient. Therefore, if selected, the prime recipient is responsible for all aspects and requirements of negotiatons, and shares information with their subrecipients. There are no limits prescribed for award allocations between prime and subrecipients."]
[235,"2024-08-08","Eligibility","Does this funding apply to Tribal governments? ","Per Section III(A) of the FOA, eligible Grantees are defined as States and units of local government that have the authority to adopt building codes. Per Section III(A)(ii)(4) of the FOA, Tribal governments are eligible to participate as subrecipients of this FOA."]
[236,"2024-08-13","Eligibility","[Summarized] For a Round 2 Submission, can the Topic Area or Subtopic Area be changed between the submission of the Concept Paper and the subsequent Full Application? ","Following FOA Mod 0003 published on 8/7/2024, concept papers are no longer required to be eligible to submit a full application. Eligible Applicants can submit Full Applications to relevant Topic Areas and Subtopic Areas regardless of any initial concept paper submission."]
[237,"2024-08-16","Technical Topics","{Summarized} Is it possible to provide a version of the spreadsheet for Topic Area 3 without the hidden or protected equations and tabs? ","Per Section IV(D)(vi) the FOA and Section 5 of the Equivalence Methodology document, applications for Topic Area 3, Subtopics A and B, that apply to existing buildings must either follow the procedure identified In Section 5 of the Equivalence Methodology document or use the calculator to determine whether the proposed  innovative building energy code achieves the required energy savings. An alternate version of the calculator will not be provided."]
[238,"2024-08-23","Technical Topics","[Summarized] If a proposed BPS has both energy and emissions targets, how should we approach equivalence to represent the true energy and emissions reductions from our BPS? ","Please refer to the response to Questions #142 and #210. "]
[239,"2024-08-23","Technical Topics","[Summarized] If a proposed BPS has inputs that do not match the options in the equivalence calculator, how should we proceed? ","Please refer to the response to Question #142."]
[240,"2024-08-23","Technical Topics","[Summarized] If we provide a customized equivalence calculation, can we used our own modeled EUIs or GHGIs for the buildings? ","Please refer to the response to Question #145."]
[241,"2024-08-23","Technical Topics","[Summarized] Could DOE provide current EUI or GHGI or fuel use for prototype buildings to help us with the comparative analysis? ","Please refer to the response to Question #145."]
[242,"2024-08-23","Technical Topics","[Summarized] Our jurisdiction has a commitment for a renewable electricity supply for all buildings. Could that meet the Section 5.4 Equivalency Determination requirement for the renewable energy requirements for the zero energy code? ","Please refer to the response to Question #140."]
[243,"2024-09-30","Other","[Summarized] Can grant funds be used for construction or to purchase equipment?","Per Section I(A) of the FOA, the grant is to support States and local governments in implementing local capacity building, multi-year investments in workforce and education, and long-term improvements in building energy codes through multi-cycle adoption and building performance standards. Per Section 1(B) of the FOA, the proposed project should include a clear validation and demonstration of adoption and implementation of eligible building codes. Please see Section V(A)(ii) in the FOA for the technical review criteria used in evaluating applications.  Moreover, per section 50131 of the Inflation Reduction Act, funds are made available to assist eligible recipients in the adoption, implementation, and enforcement of qualified building energy codes.  Support of such activities would not include support for the construction or renovation of buildings."]

{"sheet":"Admin Pick List","index":2,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":1,"rows_kept":17,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Pick List"]
[]
["Registration Requirements"]
["Webinar"]
["Concept Paper"]
["Eligibility"]
["Labs/FFRDCs"]
["Foreign Entities/Work"]
["Cost Sharing"]
["Due Dates"]
["Application Content/Format"]
["Intellectual Property"]
["Data Management"]
["Other"]
["U.S. Manufacturing Plan"]
["Application Reviews"]
["Technical Topics"]