{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":3,"sheets":["INSTRUCTIONS & TIPS","FAC CONTENT QUESTIONS","Admin Pick List"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":0,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"INSTRUCTIONS & TIPS","index":0,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,1],[9,0,9,1]]}
["INSTRUCTIONS"]
[1,"All questions pertaining to this funding opportunity announcement should be emailed to AFFECTBIL@hq.doe.gov. "]
[2,"All questions pertaining to S3 eXCHANGE should be emailed to InfrastructureExchangeSupport@hq.doe.gov. Include FAC name and number in subject line."]
[3,"All questions and answers pertaining to this FAC will be posted on S3 eXCHANGE within this spreadsheet."]
[4,"DOE will attempt to respond to a question within 3 business days, unless a similar question and answer has already been posted in this spreadsheet. "]
[5,"All questions should be submitted not later than 3 business days prior to the application due date. Questions submitted after this date will not be answered."]
[6,"Questions are assigned a number in accordance with when they are reviewed by DOE.  "]
[7,"Questions are assigned a topic area by DOE when reviewed."]
[]
["TIPS"]
[1,"Applicants may sort questions and answers in the question tabs of this spreadhseet by selecting the drop-down box arrow on the column headers and selecting any of the listed attributes."]
[2,"Applicants may search for questions and/or keywords by holding CTRL+F on the keyboard and typing in a phrase or keyword."]

{"sheet":"FAC CONTENT QUESTIONS","index":1,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["ADMINISTRATIVE QUESTION AND ANSWER LOG"]
["DE-FOA-0003026 - ASSISTING FEDERAL FACILITIES WITH ENERGY CONSERVATION TECHNOLOGIES (AFFECT) BIPARTISAN INFRASTRUCUTRE LAW (BIL) ADVANCING NET-ZERO FEDERAL FACILITIES"]
["Question #","Date Submitted","Topic","Question","Answer"]
[7,"2023-03-27","Application Content/Format","Which version of eProject Builder (ePB) Calculating Template must be used for the AFFECT grant program application analysis?","Per Section IV.B.vi., use the latest version of the ePB Calculating Template and submitted electronically in native MS Excel format as part of the application package. \n\nThe templates are available under ePB Help/Documentation, Data Templates at: https://eprojectbuilder.lbl.gov. Be sure to use the Calculating Template 3.0 and not the Non-Calculating Template 3.0."]
[22,"2023-04-05","Application Content/Format","I have a question regarding the Topical Area 2 & 3 Application form for FAC # DE-FOA-0003026 (see subject line) I was hoping to seek clarification for: \n\nSection 1.3 of the Application for Topical Area 2 & 3 asks “What are the additional ECMs for which you are seeking AFFECT funding to make the current project a net-zero buildings project? (Use table below).” Are we to list all of our proposals for this AFFECT Grant in the table or only those applicable to this specific application/project?","As stated in section IV.B.i., as part of the Full Application Content Requirement an application form, a summary slide, two versions of the ePB Calculating Templates, a letter of endorsement, and a SF-424 form are required. \n\nThe ePB Calculating Templates ask for the full list of ECMs in the project, one without the AFFECT grant ECMs and the other with. The application form and summary slides only ask for the difference, in other words just the additional ECMs in the ePB Calculating Template with the AFFECT grant. Be sure to list all the relevant ECMs in the two ePB Calculating Templates based on the scenario of with and without AFFECT grant funds."]
[34,"2023-04-05","Technical Topics","Questions regarding net zero definitions in section I-C: \n\nA) Our building, at a US military base in Japan, is not “connected to a regional electrical grid fully serviced by carbon pollution free electricity,” and we don’t know our utility’s plans for such a grid. Does AFFECT require us to calculate our utility’s scope 2 emissions and current percentage of carbon-pollution-free power? \n\nB) Can our application target one single aspect of net zero: emission OR water OR waste? “net zero emission, water, and/or waste building” seems ambiguous as stated.","A) Assuming that the said U.S. military base meets the eligibility requirements outlined in section III.A., then if you are submitting an application under Topic Area 2 or Topic Area 3, as part of the full application content requirement (IV.B.i.) two versions of eProject Builder (ePB) Calculating Template, with and without the AFFECT grant, are required. Additionally, the application forms ask for estimated reductions in scope 1 and scope 2 GHGs for the proposed project as estimated in the ePB templates. The application does not ask for current percentage of carbon-pollution-free power, but rather reductions in emissions based on the project. \n\nNote the ePB Calculating Template is unable to calculate electricity GHG reduction for projects located outside of the U.S. We are addressing this issue in the FAC and will post a modification to S3 eXCHANGE shortly.\n\nB) The FAC provides flexibility and hence, it is the decision of the applicant to pursue a combination of net-zero goals or just one."]
[47,"2023-04-07","Technical Topics","A) The ESPC is in Year 4 of the Performance Period. Do we even have the option of re-opening the contract to add scope? Is that just something that we'd discuss with the ESCO?\n\nB) What kind of additional scope is allowable? Would we be limited to expanding scope on the existing ECMs or is there an option to add a new ECM with the grant funding?\n\nC) Given that the AFFECT funding requires an ePB report, I assume we'll need to work closely with the ESCO to put an application together. If our current ESCO isn't interested in pursuing the grant/adding scope to the contract, is that a dealbreaker? Or would we have the option of finding another ESCO for the added scope?","A) It is recommended that you consult the contracting officer for the ESPC regarding path(s) for re-opening.\n\nB) Per Section I.B.ii. applications submitted under Topic Area 2 are for proposed project that would add net-zero buildings ECMs to previously awarded contracts. While per Section I.B.iii. applications under Topic Area 3 are for new projects or projects in development that support net-zero buildings efforts.\n\nAs for what may be allowable to add to an existing contract, again, it is recommended that you consult the contracting officer for the existing ESPC.\n\nC)  Per section III.A., footnote 8: “Eligible Applicants are permitted to coordinate the development of application content, information, and documentation as required for submission with National Laboratory, ESCO or Utility, or Contractor Partners as per their preference. The application, however, must be submitted by the Eligible Applicant federal agency.”\n\nIt is at the discretion of the applicant which ESCO assists with the completion of the ePB Calculating Template. The FAC does not prohibit applicant agencies from working with an ESCO. "]
[62,"2023-04-13","Application Content/Format","Will the reduction in emission measurements be calculated using total emissions or based on the percentage of emissions per facility? If the former, how do applicants account for the impact of telework?","Reduction in emissions as a result of the project will be calculating using the ePB Calculating Template. The ePB Calculating Template focuses on Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions. While the Application Form for Topic Area 2 and Topic Area 3 asks for how the project reductions compare relative to without the project for all facilities in the scope of work for the project. Keep in mind the BIL FAC focus is on net-zero buildings emissions, which is Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions as noted in section I.C."]
[67,"2023-04-18","Application Content/Format","How can diesel savings be shown? USMC’s Camp Fuji AFFECT application would include diesel and electricity savings. On “ePB Sch-Cost Savings by ECM,” there is no provision for diesel savings. We will have no natural gas savings. ","The ePB Calculating Template has the option to calculating GHG emissions for sources other than natural gas and electricity. This option will be used consistently across all applicants, as applicable. Please enter the annual MMBtu savings from diesel in the other columns (U-X) for tab Sch4-Cost Savings by ECM."]
[74,"2023-04-13","Application Content/Format","On the ePB calculation, how do we fill it out and what are the: Sch5 cancellation ceiling, Sch3 Perfect Period Cash Flow, Sch2 ESA Payments.","The FAC allows for eligible applicants to coordinate the development of application content, information, and documentation as required for submission with National Laboratory, ESCO or Utility, or Contractor Partners as per their preference. However, the application must be submitted by the eligible applicant federal agency. \n\nAdditionally, there is an Introductory Demonstration and Training Webinar video under the Training and Information Videos section and eProject Builder 3.0 User Guide under the Training Documentation section located at: https://eprojectbuilder.lbl.gov/help."]
[82,"2023-04-21","Application Content/Format","If we have already uploaded a financial model file in eProject Builder for the last application and now need to create another FM for the same project for this application, how do we save the new eProject Builder FM file? Do we use the application FAC number in the file name? ","Per section IV.B.i. Full Application Content Requirements, two ePB calculating templates, one with the AFFECT BIL grant and the other without, are to be uploaded to S3 eXCHANGE as part of the full application. Each file name should include the control number assigned by S3 eXCHANGE, not the FAC number."]
[88,"2023-04-27","Application Content/Format","For our application we are focusing on topic area 3. We currently have a direct funded project with a list of ECMs, and we are looking to expand this project to include electrification of space heating and domestic hot water systems to meet decarbonization goals. According to the AFFECT BIL FOA, applicants are required to create two scenarios using the eProject Builder (ePB) application, one without AFFECT funding and one with. The FOA also specifies that applicants must use the calculating template to submit information on these scenarios. However, according to the ePB training website direct projects can only be tracked in the non-calculating template. Given this information, I am looking for feedback on how to proceed with our proposal or if we are eligible to submit a proposal under this scenario.","One of the main differences between the calculating template and non-calculating template is the backend calculations for amortization of a financed project to generate payment schedule and savings for the period of performance, along with loan/performance contract term.\n\nFor direct funded projects and non-performance/financed contracts, you can still use the calculating template. Continue to complete as much of the information known, then on tab Sch 1-Ann Cost Save & Payment in cell D6 for Payments in Year 0 enter the total amount of the project cost/price.\n\nWe note, as specified in section I.D.iii, and as reflected in the criterion at V.B, in evaluating applications, FEMP will consider the extent to which an application leverages non-federal and federal funds."]
[93,"2023-05-03","Application Content/Format","A)  Reference: Application Form. AFFECT BIL FAC: Topic Area 2 and Topic Area 3. Q 1.5 - What is the net-zero buildings project’s proposed funding and execution plan (e.g., authorities, vehicles, and funding sources)? (250 words or less). RFI: For a new building construction without using an ESCO or UESC, does FEMP need to know the funding profile for the entire building or just the systems targeted at reducing carbon emissions (e.g., photovoltaics, geothermal, etc.)?\nB) Reference: Application Form. TA 2 & TA 3. Section 3 Leverage. RFI: For new building construction without using an ESCO or UESC, what is meant by \"the project\" for the purpose of identifying the source and amount of funding? Does \"the project\" mean the entire new building, all energy conservation measures (ECMs) incorporated into the design (e.g. photovoltaics, geothermal, enhanced lighting controls, etc.) but not other aspects of the building, only systems that are to be modified by the proposed AFFECT ECM (e.g. mechanicals systems if the AFFECT ECM reduces HVAC energy use) but not other aspects of the building, or only the proposed AFFECT ECM?\nC)  Reference: SF-424. 18 Estimated Funding. RFI: Same question as above regarding if we should enter funding values for the entire building or only some aspect. Also, where (a, b, c, d, e, or f) should we enter the requested AFFECT funding amount?\nD) Reference: ePB_Calculating file, tab Sch4-Cost Savings by ECM and Application Form. TA 2 & TA 3. Section 2.\na. RFI: For a new construction building, what do we use as the \"baseline\" for energy use, energy costs, and O&M costs for the savings calculations?\nb. RFI: For a new construction building, what values should we use for \"usage and cost\" for the \"the previous fiscal year\" to calculate the percentage reduction? The building doesn't exist yet, so it's unclear if there is any previous fiscal year usage and costs.\nE) Reference: ePB_Calculating file, tab Sch4-Cost Savings by ECM. RFI: For a new construction building, should we include each energy conservation measure (ECM) in the building design in Sch4, regardless of whether it is an ECM for which we are seeking AFFECT funding? This question applies to both Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 as defined in the FAC Section IV, C, vi eProject Builder.\nF) Reference: SF-424. 18 Estimated Funding. RFI: Where do we enter utility incentives (a, b, c, d, e, or f)? Where do we enter the requested AFFECT funding? ","In response to parts A thru D of the question: Per section III.D. “FEMP will not make eligibility determinations for potential applications prior to the date on which applications to this FAC must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FAC lies solely with the applicant.”  \n\nBased on the information provided in your question, we provide the following information that may assist you: \n\nThe applicant must determine the scope and subject of the project submitted in an application. When determining the scope and subject of a proposed project, keep in mind, that the statutory purpose of the AFFECT program is to assist agencies in meeting the requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 8253. The requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 8253 generally apply to existing buildings. In the context of energy savings performance contracts, FEMP has addressed new construction, including the appropriate baselining of energy and water use, in Guidance on New Construction under an Energy Savings Performance Contracts available at: https://www.energy.gov/femp/articles/guidance-new-construction-under-energy-savings-performance-contract and in question 17 of the Federal Energy Savings Contracts FAQ available at: https://www.energy.gov/node/2206881. \n\nE)  As noted in the FAC, for Topic Area 2 and Topic Area 3, an application must include two scenarios modeled via the ePB Calculating template illustrating the current scope of work versus the scope of work with measures which the applicant seeks AFFECT grant funds for. Therefore, yes, each ECM should be included.\n\nF) It is recommended that utility incentives be entered in c, d, or e depending on the source. For example, if utility incentive is derived from a State program, enter the value in c. The AFFECT grant funding being requested must be entered in a."]
[99,"2023-05-09","Application Content/Format","In relation to the required ePB templates for Topical Area 2 & 3 in the AFFECT BIL grant, we have been experiencing issues with filling out the template in for our direct-funded project. We reached out to the ePB team and scheduled a training session to find a solution, however, the ePB team determined that the calculating template is not for use with direct-funded projects; ePB is designed so that direct-funded projects must use the non-calculating template.\n\nGiven this new information for direct-funded projects, would it be acceptable to only submit only the non-calculating template for our direct-funded projects?","The FAC leverages the use of ePB Calculating Templates to ensure consistency in data submission and calculations. We recognize there may be limitations to the tool and sometime not so obvious workarounds. Please reach out to the ePB team for assistance with these limitations at: epb-support@lbl.gov. \n\nAdditionally, note that the ePB Calculating Templates are one of many documents that are part for the full application as noted in section IV.B.i. Furthermore, it is recommended that the applicant review the Topic Area 2 and Topic Area 3 Technical Review Criteria in section V.B. for details on how full applications will be reviewed."]
[101,"2023-05-11","Application Content/Format","The ePB has limitations. We cannot get the TO schedules to work accurately in the calculating template. It does not allow for different start dates, interest rates, and guaranteed savings factors, etc. For Topic Area 2 only, can a non-calculating template be used for the combined template? Or could the second template only show the modification? \n \nIf not, we would need to indicate that all inputs have been adjusted to try and make it look as close as possible, but it isn't the real anticipated financial structure. The ePB team has acknowledged this limitation and provided recommendations to only include the modification on the calculating template.","The FAC leverages the use of ePB Calculating Templates to ensure consistency in data submission and calculations. We recognize there may be limitations to the tool and sometime not so obvious workarounds. \n\nBased on the information provided, we recommend adjusting the inputs to align closely with real anticipated financial structure as advised by the ePB team. You may also note this in the application form as part of the project description."]
[109,"2023-05-19","Application Content/Format","For Topic Areas 2 and 3, the applicant is required to submit two scenarios in eProject Builder. For Scenario 1, the FAC states “Scenario 1 Project Without AFFECT BIL Grant. Submit the completed ePB Calculating Template showing a financeable project that does not include an AFFECT BIL grant. This scenario represents a project that is financeable and that an applicant can implement with an ESPC, UESC, or other funding sources that does not receive an AFFECT BIL grant.”  My agency is developing several projects to renovate, expand, or otherwise modify existing buildings, to be paid for using appropriated funds. Can our current documents (drawings, lists of materials, contract SOWs, etc.) for these projects serve as the input for Scenario 1? This is what we intend to build without the AFFECT BIL grant.","Agency specific documents (drawings, list of materials, contract SOW, etc.) are very good resources to inform completing an application. The FAC does not apply limitation on source documents for completing an application. The FAC does limit what can be submitted as part of an application. Please see section IV.B.i. Full Application Content Requirements for details on required documents by Topic Area."]
[115,"2023-05-24","Application Content/Format","We are working on an application for Topic Area 3 where the project is directly funded by the agency. As a result, we don't have a \"guaranteed cost savings.\" Can you confirm that we should just fill out the \"estimated cost savings\" column of Schedule #1 in the eProject Builder Spreadsheet?","For completing the ePB calculating template for a direct funded project, it is optional to provide a value for “estimated cost savings” in cell B6, Tab Sch 1-Ann Cost Sav & Pymts. "]
[116,"2023-05-25","Other","A) Are there training opportunities for eProject Builder available from FEMP?\n\nB) Will there be additional AFFECT training opportunities or information releases (e.g., release of awarded projects once that information comes available)?","A) FEMP anticipates training for ePB in future rounds. Similar to the AFFECT BIL FAC, the training session would be announced on S3 eXCHANGE once scheduled and the session recorded and posted for all.\n\nB) Other than an ePB training, we will further analyze the Q&A and may provide additional guidance based on our findings. Should anything be provided, it will be posted to S3 eXCHANGE for all."]
[120,"2023-05-25","Application Content/Format","Are there standard escalation rates for electricity and water in the DC Metro Area (Pepco) that applicants can use in their ePB spreadsheets?","In general, energy prices are assumed to change at rates projected by DOE's Energy Information Administration and published by NIST, except that— \n(1) If the Federal agency is using component prices that agency may use corresponding component escalation rates provided by the energy supplier. \n(2) For Federal buildings in foreign countries, the Federal agency may use a “reasonable” escalation rate. \n\nThe NIST Energy Escalation Rate Calculator, is available at:  https://pages.nist.gov/eerc/\n\nWe are not aware of a similar tool for water. If the Federal agency is using component prices that agency may use corresponding component escalation rates provided by the water supplier. Additionally, the 2017 Water and Wastewater Annual Escalation Rates for Selected Cities across the United States (available at: https://www.energy.gov/femp/articles/water-and-wastewater-annual-price-escalation-rates-selected-cities-across-united) provides helpful insight on estimating annual price escalation of water. However, your best resource will be your utility for this information."]
[146,"2024-03-18","Application Content/Format","We have the following question regarding the subject FAC: ePB question for power mixes other than eGRID. Unfortunately, eProjectBuilder does not allow entering a specific resource mix. \n\nWe’ve taken varying approaches to different grant applications, and we thought it was best to seek clarification and standardize our approach.","As provided in section IV.B.vi of the FAC, “To establish a consistent basis for evaluating applications, all agencies submitting\nan application under Topic Areas 2 and Topic Area 3 are required to provide all schedules within the ePB Calculating Template, with the exception of Schedule #5 Cancellation Ceilings. The completed ePB Calculating Template must include the completed GHG emissions worksheet Schedule #4g that calculates the extent to which a proposed project will reduce GHG emissions.”  \n\nFor U.S. based projects please use the eGRID factor associated with the location of your proposed project. For projects located outside of the U.S. please choose “U.S. Default.” For projects outside of the U.S., and other emission methodologies, leverage the notes section.\n\nFor additional guidance on use ePB, please see the posted training from April 18: https://infrastructure-exchange.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID=cd71acde-2801-4d3f-8b81-c1b262aa752f  "]
[150,"2024-03-01","Application Content/Format","We are considering submitting a proposal under Topic Area 3, but we don’t yet have an ESCO with which we are working, because we don’t have a project going yet. Since we will have to put out an RFP for the installation, any ESCO working with us at this early stage would not be guaranteed of being awarded the project, so what would be their motivation for helping at this stage? We are about to get bids for initiating a solar system design for our facility, but do not have it yet, so we don’t have many hard numbers for ePB. How do other applicants deal with this? Is it okay for us to use very rough estimates for these values, or should we instead wait for the next round of submissions, after we have more of a concrete design?","Per section III.D, “FEMP will not make eligibility determinations for potential applications prior to the date on which applications to this FAC must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FAC lies solely with the applicant.” \n\nBased on the limited information provided in your question, we provide the following information that may assist you:\n\nAs provided in section I.D.iv of the FAC, “Topic Area 3 applications must include two scenarios modeled via the ePB Calculating Template. The first scenario must illustrate the current scope of work anticipated for the new project or project in development. The second scenario must illustrate a financeable project with the AFFECT BIL grant, which has an increased scope of work that includes additional and/or modified ECMs to support the applicant’s net-zero buildings efforts.”\n\nAdditionally, as noted in footnote 9 in section V.A of the FAC: “Eligible Applicants are permitted to coordinate the development of application content, information, and documentation as required for submission with ESCO, Utility, or Contractor Partners as per the Applicant’s preference. However, the application must be submitted by the Eligible Applicant federal agency.”\n\nThe submission deadlines for each application round along with expected date for selection notification are noted on the first page of the FAC.\n\nIt is recommended, the applicant evaluate the full FAC and make a determination whether to submit an application, the appropriate Topic Area, and the most suitable phase of the FAC."]
[156,"2024-02-02","Application Content/Format","I’m writing to get some clarification about which Topic Area to pursue. We are working on a nomination for a batch of sites that previously implemented ECMs under an existing IDIQ. The nomination we’re developing is for new (but similar) projects, and the applicant would be implementing these projects under the same IDIQ. Would this nomination fall under Topic Area 2 (since it will utilize an existing contract) or Topic Area 3 (since these are new projects)?\n• Given this is a batch nomination to implement the same project (geothermal) at multiple sites, do you recommend entering each site as a separate ECM within ePB, or is there another way you would prefer to review the nomination data? Note we also have savings figures from other sites where the project was already implemented and can provide those savings figures in the nomination narrative or elsewhere depending on your preference.\n• The nomination we’re developing is for new (but similar) projects, and the applicant would be implementing these projects under the same IDIQ. Would this nomination fall under Topic Area 2 (since it will utilize an existing contract) or Topic Area 3 (since these are new projects)?","Per section III.D, “FEMP will not make eligibility determinations for potential applications prior to the date on which applications to this FAC must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FAC lies solely with the applicant.” \n\nBased on the limited information provided in your question, we provide the following information that may assist you:\n\nIt is recommended the applicant evaluate the full FAC, before making a determination of whether to submit an application and which Topic Area. As provided in section I.D.iii. and iv., Topic Area 2 is for proposed projects that would add net-zero buildings ECMs to previously awarded contracts and Topic Area 3 is for new projects or projects in development that have not been awarded yet. \n\nIt is recommended that the applicant consult the contracting officer for the project and procurement team for agency specific advice on modifying the existing IDIQ. \n\nIn regard to data entry into ePB, the ePB workbook allows for flexibility of entering information for multiple or single location. If the locations are in different eGRID regions, reporting of ECMs separately by location would provide more representative emission calculations."]
[157,"2024-04-03","Application Content/Format","If we are to apply under Topic Area 3, is there a requirement that we are funding some of it with external funding? For example, we have a great project that converts from fuel oil heating to electric (hyrdo grid). However, we do not have any funding available to supplement the potential AFFECT funding. As I understand the guidance, we would score poorly on Criteria 3 Leverage, but could still compete for project funding.\n\nIn that same scenario, when making two different ePB entries – would one just represent the status quo and the other represent the AFFECT funding, since we do not have other funds to execute the project?","Per section III.D, “FEMP will not make eligibility determinations for potential applications prior to the date on which applications to this FAC must be submitted. The decision whether to submit an application in response to this FAC lies solely with the applicant.” \n\nBased on the limited information provided in your question, we provide the following information that may assist you:\n\nCost leverage is part of the evaluation criteria per section V.C. Criterion 3. Furthermore, per section II.B. Cost Leverage, “in accordance with the factors established in 42 U.S.C. § 8256(b)(3)(C) and (D), consideration of cost leverage evaluates the amount requested by the applicant federal agency as compared to the total investment cost of the subject project.” \n\nAs provided in section IV.B.vi., “agencies are required to submit two scenarios for their proposed project that use the latest version of the ePB Calculating Template, submitted electronically in native MS Excel format as follows: Scenario 1 Project Without AFFECT BIL Grant. Submit the completed ePB Calculating Template showing a financeable project that does not include an AFFECT BIL grant. This scenario represents a project that is financeable and that an applicant can implement with an ESPC, UESC, and/or other funding sources that does not receive an AFFECT BIL grant. Scenario 2 Project With AFFECT BIL Grant. Submit the completed ePB Calculating Template showing the same project in Scenario 1 with increased scope that can be included, and is financeable, when applying an AFFECT BIL grant in the amount the applicant is requesting. The AFFECT BIL grant can be entered into ePB Calculating template as an “Applied Incentive” on the MS Excel worksheet “Sch2-Imp Price by ECM”.” "]
[162,"2024-04-09","Application Content/Format","ePB question for power mixes other than eGRID:\n\nOur power is directly transmitted from nuclear and hydroelectric sources, across our site and to our substations before it is available to the grid or mixed with other sources. This unique power infrastructure configuration and purchase agreement means that the power used at our site is 96% 24/7 CFE.\n\nUnfortunately, eProjectBuilder does not allow entering a specific resource mix. We have the following options:\n1) Use WECC NW and apply a correction factor in columns M and N of the ePB as “Other Savings” with no cost but reflecting the delta in emissions between WECC NW and BPA attested power.\n2) Use WECC NW for ePB and present the corrected numbers, with an explanatory end note, on the application forms, justifying the deltas between ePB and presented numbers.\n3) Choose Upstate NY as the closest to Hanford emissions, with corrected numbers and an end note in the application forms.\n\nWe’ve taken varying approaches to different grant applications, and we thought it was best to seek clarification and standardize our approach. We recommend option 1, as it most closely approximates our calculated numbers in the ePB and maintains consistency with our power mix, and between ePB outputs and application form numbers.","Section IV.B.vi of the FAC states, “The completed ePB Calculating Template must include the completed GHG emissions worksheet Schedule #4g that calculates the extent to which a proposed project will reduce GHG emissions.”  FEMP will evaluate the current GHG emissions of a subject facility as compared to the projected GHG emissions following the proposed project. To provide a consistent approach, and as presented at the 4/18/2024 ePB training ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyqtJXVoHck), please use the appropriate eGRID factor. "]

{"sheet":"Admin Pick List","index":2,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":1,"rows_kept":17,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Pick List"]
[]
["Registration Requirements"]
["Webinar"]
["Eligibility"]
["Labs/FFRDCs"]
["Foreign Entities/Work"]
["Cost Sharing"]
["Due Dates"]
["Application Content/Format"]
["Intellectual Property"]
["Data Management"]
["Other"]
["U.S. Manufacturing Plan"]
["Application Reviews"]
["Technical Topics"]
["Award Information"]